| Revision as of 04:45, 4 January 2012 editQwyrxian (talk | contribs)57,186 edits →January 2012: tweak← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:48, 4 January 2012 edit undoRejedef (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users761 edits →January 2012Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| == January 2012 == | == January 2012 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. Keep this up when your block is up, and I'll make it longer next time, and eventually just indefinitely block you. DIscuss. The. Issue. There are valid concerns on the talk page of that and ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason='' |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. Keep this up when your block is up, and I'll make it longer next time, and eventually just indefinitely block you. DIscuss. The. Issue. There are valid concerns on the talk page of that and ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''No reason to block ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 04:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | ||
Revision as of 22:48, 4 January 2012
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Welcome to my discussion board. Last time it was cleared and archived on 1st of January 2012.
Europe
Hi, I agree with your Controversy section, and that Eastern Europe is a bogus term. The inherent problem with English Misplaced Pages is that most admins have a poor and biased understanding of its geopolitical and cultural implications, as several admins here are simple American/British teenagers with a dated/uneducated worldview: they will not support this progressive/educated view, more like oppose it. Sad but true. I avoid edit wars as they're pointless. So how can I help? ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 12:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
In fact there are two controversy sections (in Eastern Europe and Western Europe). I do recommend you the one in Western Europe which elaborated to an advanced level. I do agree with your statement: although I have no proof they are teenagers, it is very clear that their knowledge of geography and geopolitics is very poor, apparently outdated or even uneducated. The most shocking example is the guy Arcillaroja. All his arguments were... against him but he stated that no one can deny this:There is a clear difference between East and West Europe in terms of culture, language groups, social and economic standards, history, religion, racial groups, migratory movements, etc. Nobody can deny this. All these aspects are border-less in scale of Europe, however the racial groups made me disturbed. Not only because of its merit, even if we stick to the idea of races which are pretty much mixed and context-dependent but also because this statement is racist. Please note he did not have any research to support it and clearly followed the Cold War Divisions. I suggest to find other users who actually support the new division. After all, facts shall prevail. Also, we may like to find as many resources as possible in favour of the new division and add them wherever possible. This is unacceptable that people who have no resources and no appropriate education, practically rule on Misplaced Pages. The sub-division to which I am relating is: http://141.74.33.52/stagn/JordanEuropaRegional/tabid/71/Default.aspx So, would you like to ally on that matter?--Rejedef (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012
{{unblock|reason=No reason to block ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)