| Revision as of 20:01, 28 January 2012 editMadmanBot (talk | contribs)67,844 edits Semi-automated edit: Delivering message by request.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:29, 28 January 2012 edit undoYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →note: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| A request for comments ] on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. <!-- Please note that this notification is being delivered by request and by a neutral party. --> Thank you, ] (]) 20:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC) | A request for comments ] on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. <!-- Please note that this notification is being delivered by request and by a neutral party. --> Thank you, ] (]) 20:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == note == | |||
| Hi, I just wanted to let you know, that deaf dumb comment was not directed at you, sorry if you picked that it was. The problem of the outing - ish details has arisen because a user has ''demanded'' the details to be posted. My position was that is is pretty much accepted common knowledge with the having to post the specifics ... none of which issues you were involved in at all, so I am sorry about my poorly worded comment. <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">]</font><font color="red">]</font> 22:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:29, 28 January 2012
| This is John Cline's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello John Cline! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Articles for Creation Appeal
Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
 Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1772 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. |
January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility enforcement/Workshop
As you may have noticed the clerks closed the workshop on this. Fifelfoo (talk) 08:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- Actually I hadn't noticed, I will follow any advice given by a clerk to this regard. I do see indications that edits will be considered timely until Friday, January 20, 2012. Hopefully this is correct because it was never my intention to forgo proposing a remedy, and mine was not ready to publish until the moment you saw it published. Thanks for the heads up however. My76Strat (talk) 08:59, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Creation and evolution in public education
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation and evolution in public education. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Bunt (community)
Thanks for doing the honours at RPP etc. I've done it before but it looks bad if it is always me running back and forth - there are enough people accusing me of ownership etc across a wide swathe of caste articles already & so if someone else occasionally sticks their oar in then some of the attention gets diverted. Although hopefully you will not receive the abuse that I do! - Sitush (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. I don't approve of edit warring as a means to include content. If the IP has a valid point, dispute resolution should resolve their concerns favorably. To circumvent established processes only makes their efforts more suspect. IMO - My76Strat (talk) 12:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 12:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dipankan 12:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
New Semester, New Cohort
Hello there! I am teaching roughly the same course to a new group of folks this semester. The course page is here. Any interest on helping this one out again? I think we will only have 14 students this semester. One of the students from last semester is acting as the CA. Debaser42 (talk) 13:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Improving article on Ovation Guitars?
Hej My76Strat!
You may enjoy working with me to improve Ovation Guitars, which still has a lot of sources closely connected with the company.
Today, I picked up an reliable secondary-source (out-of-print history of the company today), which I'll use firstly to provide MRHQ page references where possible.
Any encyclopedia or reference on guitars discusses Ovations, and they would provide even more reliable sources. (Like many company histories, the book was written with the cooperation of Ovation, and so other sources would be even more authoritative, especially when discussing design innovations---bowl, (ergonomic) shallow-bowls, electronic pick-ups, tuner, top sound-holes, neck (reinforcement and electric-feeling thin-ness as well as use of synthetics rather than only wood). Even a Swedish bookstore had a too-expensive directory of guitars with 10 pages on various Ovations. I'll bet that you or your local libraries would have a lot of nice references! :)
Does that sound mildly interesting to you? (You might just enjoy reading the feature story in the New York Times, which is publicly available, for free apparently.)
Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 21:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Classroom coordination/SFSU Class Project#Checklist for articles
Well, it looks like they're all done (ages ago). If you're still up for it, could you please fly through the articles and fill in the ticks? Many thanks. (If you can't for some reason, please let me know, and I will look after it.) Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Fæ
A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you, MadmanBot (talk) 20:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
note
Hi, I just wanted to let you know, that deaf dumb comment was not directed at you, sorry if you picked that it was. The problem of the outing - ish details has arisen because a user has demanded the details to be posted. My position was that is is pretty much accepted common knowledge with the having to post the specifics ... none of which issues you were involved in at all, so I am sorry about my poorly worded comment. Youreallycan 22:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)