Misplaced Pages

User talk:Vanished user ewfisn2348tui2f8n2fio2utjfeoi210r39jf: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:20, 10 February 2012 view sourceAirborne84 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users21,266 edits Moving text: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 06:11, 10 February 2012 view source Vanished user ewfisn2348tui2f8n2fio2utjfeoi210r39jf (talk | contribs)45,314 editsm Reverted edits by Airborne84 (talk) to last version by CarlaudeNext edit →
Line 55: Line 55:
:Point taken. :Point taken.
:I would appreciate if you can also include this input on the ] page. Thanks. <sup>'''] ]</sup> 12:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC) :I would appreciate if you can also include this input on the ] page. Thanks. <sup>'''] ]</sup> 12:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

== Moving text ==

Hi Carlaude. Please refrain from moving or splitting my comments on the Christian ethics talk page. I asked once, but perhaps you did not see that, as it was done again. Moving another editors comments on talk pages is normally not allowed as per WP:talk. Thanks. --] (]) 04:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:11, 10 February 2012

If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere. If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.

Mount Nebo move requests

I reformatting the two Mount Nebo move requests as a multimove which now appears only at Talk:Mount Nebo (Jordan)#Requested move. Can you please check to make sure this is what you intended. Thanks, France3470 (talk) 20:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Books of the Old Testament

Template:Books of the Old Testament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. EncycloPetey (talk) 18:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Christmas

Merry Christmas

History2007 (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit war looming

I left this on the Talk page of biblical cosmology. Unless you either back down (I don't think you will), or I back down (I won't), or you can suggest a third option, then we go to Option 4, which is ANI. PiCo (talk) 10:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

You haven't replied. Ok, it hasn't been so long. There's one step before ANI. Please tell me someone you want to mediate between us. It has to be someone who knows the subject, at least in general terms. And it has to be someone acceptable to both of us. And, of course, the person has to accept. If that doesn't work, we have to go to ANI to look for an official mediator. PiCo (talk) 02:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Dispute resolution noticeboard: Biblical cosmology

A notice of dispute has been lodged at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard regarding our dispute at Biblical cosmology. The notice seeks an informal mediator. Please read the notification and make any comment you feel is necessary. PiCo (talk) 06:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, Carlaude. An informal dispute resolution process is currently taking place at the dispute resolution noticeboard. As an editor involved in this dispute, we would really value your input there. ItsZippy 16:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Carlaude: I've noticed at the DRN that you haven't had any input for a few days; given the time of year, it might better to give ourselves a break till the New Year. All the best for the season. PiCo (talk) 01:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

That sounds good to me. Cheers! - 01:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Carl. I've started editing again at Biblical cosmology. At the moment I'm proposing some new sections to make the article more comprehensive (how, for example, can you talk about cosmology without mentioning how the universe was created?) There are also a lot of new books in the bibliography - they're meant as a resource bank that we can consult while writing, plus of course to check that's what's written is an accurate reflection of what the sources say. Please take a look. (I won't reactivate the dispute notification). PiCo (talk) 01:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Male actors

Category:Male actors, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

My crappy disambiguation

I see that you've changed my disambiguation link at Progressive revelation. Would you say that Evangelicalism should be listed as a topic at Conservative Christianity? D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Yea, I don't know.
Seems like Conservative Christianity being a disambiguation page is a problem. I would rather just point to Conservative Christianity. 03:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I wrote up the article. Christian conservatism. It's just a stub, but I'm sure there are plenty of people who know more about Christianity than I do who can improve it. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Two things about Talk:Biblical cosmology

Hey, Carlaude, why did you change the indent of my post? It makes the page harder to read, and changing other people's talk posts is generally frowned on without a pressing need to do so. Also, it makes things easier if you sign your post by putting four tildes (~) at the end of your post. It's hard to separate what you've written and what other people have written. Per WP:TPO, I've added the unsigned template to your posts in the discussion thread, and undone the changes to indents. Writ Keeper 12:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

I do not think I changed the indent of your post, but if I did you can let me see where.
I also sorry about forgetting to sign. 05:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
It was this edit, but no worries. It's not that big a deal, easy to change back (I already have), and I know you did it with good intentions. :) Writ Keeper 16:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Christian ethics

I much prefer the new definition (and other changes) you have provided for Christian ethics, but would like to see a reference for it. Thanks, Editor2020 (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Point taken.
I would appreciate if you can also include this input on the Talk:Christian ethics page. Thanks. 12:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)