| Revision as of 18:04, 18 February 2012 editCodrinb (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,417 edits →Welcome to WP:ROMANIA!: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:28, 20 May 2012 edit undo69.171.176.145 (talk) →King Michael's abdicationNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :Thank you, Fsol, for your recent work on ]! It made the article (with a couple of exceptions - see my edits) much better. ] (]) 15:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | :Thank you, Fsol, for your recent work on ]! It made the article (with a couple of exceptions - see my edits) much better. ] (]) 15:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Stop engaging in censorship of legitimate, factual, and accurate reporting on this site. Typical of faith-based ideologues like yourself to censor criticisms that you personally don't approve. | |||
| Cease or you will be exposed and discredited. | |||
| == Copyright violations == | == Copyright violations == | ||
Revision as of 02:28, 20 May 2012
King Michael's abdication
Hi, Fsol. Again, I thank you for pointing out that January 2007 article from the NYT. As I said I would, I did add some of that material in the article on Michael, which I think is the logical place to treat that issue in detail. As a matter of fact, I found a corroboration for the blackmail story -- a 2005 article from the Daily Telegraph. There is though a dispute there, on how to interpret some other sources, maybe you know more about these events and would like to weigh in. Turgidson (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sure thing -- here is the link you asked for. Turgidson (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, Fsol, for your recent work on Michael I of Romania! It made the article (with a couple of exceptions - see my edits) much better. Lil' mouse (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Stop engaging in censorship of legitimate, factual, and accurate reporting on this site. Typical of faith-based ideologues like yourself to censor criticisms that you personally don't approve.
Cease or you will be exposed and discredited.
Copyright violations
Your additions to the lede of Libertarianism are a copyright violation by close paraphrase of Peter Vallentyne's work, specifically:
- Vallentyne, "is the moral view that agents initially fully own themselves and have certain moral powers to acquire property rights in external things"
- Your addition, "is the political philosophy that holds individuals initially own themselves and have property rights in external things"
- In particular, "own themselves and have ... property rights in external things"
Do not do this, it is a copyright violation. Fifelfoo (talk) 07:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- These are common terms "own themseleves", "property right", "external thing". It is ridiculous to reformulate just in order to get different terms.Fsol (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- You have been mentioned at WP:AN/I. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies, I meant to post it at AN/I but I must have slipped up and posted it at AN. yours with apologies, Fifelfoo (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- No worry, it's the thought that matters. -- Fsol (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies, I meant to post it at AN/I but I must have slipped up and posted it at AN. yours with apologies, Fifelfoo (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- You have been mentioned at WP:AN/I. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to WP:ROMANIA!
Thanks for joining and looking forward to collaborate on great articles! Best regards. --Codrin.B (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)