| Revision as of 11:57, 11 March 2012 edit61.18.170.186 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:34, 11 March 2014 edit undoButterfly0fdoom (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,085 edits ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Co-locations section deleted: ]== | |||
| I have to disagree with you in this matter, co-location information is necessary for some passengers that might want to know about the quality standards and benefits that the alliance provides. There is a reason why ] and ] pages also have information about the co-locations and hubs. It is perfectly understandable if you do not consider the information necessary but please show some respect to the accurate information that has costed some one else's work. Thankyou. | |||
| ] (]) 04:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Luisrmb_772 | |||
| ==Toyota NA Model History: MY 09 Additions== | |||
| That would work, though I think you are "right-er"; ultimately it's speculation until they show up on the showroom floor (Toyota has pushed models back before, 09 Corolla was supposed to be new in Fall of 07). Unsourced is unsourced, its all spec. until the product is on market. My apologies again for the attitude. ] 19:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Mis-read your comments, my apologies. ] 18:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Prius== | |||
| I saw the tag on this article saying that it needs clean up. I plan to clean it up and make it an article that readers will like. I want to develop a consensus so I will only do a little at a time so that people can see and approve it. | |||
| I checked all the images and they are all free use. Later, I'll help select photos but will hold off as this may be controversial. I started a little re-writing the models. I will work on this slowly before moving to a new section. | |||
| I'm writing to you because you have edited that article several times. I won't edit everyday but that does not mean I forgot about the article. ] (]) 03:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I'd like to expand the article where it counts, like about the car. I'd like to shrink the article where it's actually a content fork and should be under hybrid technology (just as other cars don't go into great detail about how a gasoline engine works). I put a note under the talk page for the car about taking out some of the engine technology stuff. | |||
| Overall, I think the article will shrink a bit when it's done. Ok with you? I would like to see the article focused on the car.] (]) 22:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Also see the talk page about deleting or shrinking the subsection about disappointing fuel consumption to 1 sentence (and probably relocating the sentence). After all, there is dissatisfaction about US EPA fuel consumption estimates (mpg) in general, not specifically about the Prius mpg. Here's your chance to form a consensus (on the talk page). I purposely discuss deletions before doing it to avoid edit wars. ] (]) 22:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| New points raised in the Prius talk page. I don't want to be too knife happy so I'm doing it slowly and talking about it first. Over time, I think the article can be better. ] (]) 03:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I think the article is better but still could use some work. Will work on it but probably not everyday. ] (]) 03:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==My name== | |||
| I got my name changed by a bureaucrat. I saw that someone called Laos got blocked because of the name. Laos is a name of a country. Congolese is the name of the people of Congo. I didn't want any trouble so I asked for a new name. I am letting you know because you knew me from before (as Congolese). | |||
| I am going to wait for a few days for my Toyota Prius suggestions to be seen. Then I think I'll do some trimming. In the last few days, some people who I think want to keep most of the stuff have appeared. No worry, we can discuss it and reach an agreement. I know that I'm a nice person who is reasonable. ] (]) 03:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == California High Speed Rail == | |||
| I would appreciate you telling me why you undid my revision in the California HSR page, rather than undoing my revision without giving a legitimate reason. | |||
| ] (]) 07:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Native94080 | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi? I would like to invite you to give me some opinions/comments and vote over the page of FAC: Macau so that more improvement can be made. Thanks! ] (]) 18:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == goodbye == | |||
| Because of overzealous attacks against me by Jehochman, I will no longer be editing the three articles that I was working towards FA status nor Congo articles. Jehochman went on a rampage RFCU. His RFCU claims were disproven and according to another user, he lied about the category. | |||
| WP:SOCK#LEGIT allows multiple accounts for segregation and security. The multiple accounts edited separate articles. | |||
| A multiple account was necessary because of the controversial nature of User:Profg. Editing about him would bring stalkers to the 3 FA contenders. Edits about User:Profg were never meant to defend him but to point out things that the community was overlooking. The community shouldn’t overlook everything that a user says simply because he is bad. One member of the community said he was seeking a ban just to make it easier to accuse others. These is a diabolical scheme. | |||
| What good does is exposing User:HappyBirthdayClubMember? That’s like exposing the identity of Santa Claus. ] (]) 02:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == January 2008 == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Hello. Please don't forget to provide an ]{{#if:MacBook Air|, which wasn't included with your recent edit to ]}}. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ] (] • ]) 21:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == iPod article == | |||
| I have no idea to what previous debate you refer, but of course "iPod" requires an article. The definite article is used throughout the article, for example in the second paragraph: "Apple focused its development on the iPod's unique user interface and its ease of use." Do you really think it would be best to change that to "development on iPod's unique user interface"? The only possible reason for using the zero article would be to emulate Apple's marketing materials, which drop the article in an attempt to anthropomorphize the product. But, since Misplaced Pages is not a product brochure, I think we should stick with standard English grammar. | |||
| ] (]) 14:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for kindly replying on my talk page. Would you be able to point me to the previous consensus, so I could at least gain some idea of the context of this argument, and avoid making the same arguments redundantly? | |||
| :] (]) 19:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Car Timeline Templates == | |||
| Leaving the 2009 model year blank for current car models suggests that those models will be canceled in 2009. Most car companies will have made announcements by now that models will be discontinued for 2009 (e.g. ]). If you'd like, you can either shade the 2009 continuations in a different color, or remove 2009 from the timelines altogether. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Perhaps a year should not be added to the timeline unless the model year's complete lineup has been announced. Otherwise, you have no way to differentiate between models we know will be cancelled in 2009, and models we are unsure of. --] <sup>]</sup> 18:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: I have ended the rows at 2008 for the models you claim as unconfirmed for 2009. This will help eliminate confusion over whether the models have been confirmed to be cancelled in 2009 or not. A blank space after a model means the same thing as a blank space before a model. If you believe otherwise, then please present your rules so we can come to a consensus on them. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Template:Timeline of ipod == | |||
| Why did you rv my edits to those templates? What is your justification that the previous version was better than my edit?] (]) 06:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Tori Amos discography == | |||
| Heya. I am wondering why you removed Legs and Boots and iTunes Essentials from the albums list? Generally on discography pages these releases are considered albums though they are not in the traditional sense, i.e., they are not physical releases. Legs and Boots might not be appropriate for the albums section given that it is also in "Live material", but ] releases ''are'' considered albums for the purpose of discographies. More Pink had 12 tracks which constitutes an album (as opposed to an EP which are normally around 3-5 tracks) and I don't think it matters much where it was released in regards to its status as an album or not. These are official Amos releases and they (with the exception of Legs and Boots) have accompanying articles, so what's the deal with removing them altogether? ] (]) 15:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| * Butterfly0fdoom wrote: "fine, then, rv vandalism. Happy now? There is not need to toss in a grammatical pronounciation. non-connectiong makes more sense than not connecting. not a focus city could mean a hub." | |||
| * Response: Yes, I'm happy now! Cheers! --] (]) 06:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks... == | |||
| finally someone understands that the Air Canada reference should be put in the International termina lsection in the SFO artcle. I've been fighting undos on that for months. You made my day!] (]) 07:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| * ''While you may have put in tremendous effort, usually, such changes are discussed in the discussion page for a consensus prior to implementation. As thus, I have opened up a section of the talk page for such purpose. | |||
| Thanks for your note; I've just left some comments there. ] (]) 04:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Lexus timeline == | |||
| If you remove crystall balls why you dont remove the rx aswell, now is 2008, how you know this particular model will be produced next year? and all others dont --— ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 18:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Anyway it looks silly, you can get impression that all other models have been or will be discontinued... --— ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 18:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Its still crystal ball, you cant be sure they will produce it next year, anything can happen... --— ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 18:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Most? manufacturers dont state the availability of each/next year models, they just announce when the production will stop or when new model will replace it its not crystal balling..its well known when new replacning models are coming. --— ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 20:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Sony Ericsson == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| Symbian may be used in more that P-series, but every P-series device is a Symbian device, so "P-series is Symbian UIQ business and power-user smartphones" IS a valid statement. Do you agree? | |||
| Also, right now XPERIA series only includes one WM device, there were no other announcements yet. However, I would agree that they did mention the inclusion of Symbian devices some time in the future. | |||
| So my suggestion is to have "Symbian UIQ business and power-user communicators" for P and "Windows Mobile and Symbian UIQ communicators, convergence and powerhouse devices" for X. | |||
| Touchscreen and QWERTY keyboards make these devices more communicators than smartphones. Right now OS is what makes X series and P series different. When more devices are available, we may wish to change X series description to "Multimedia smartphones", but not now. | |||
| If you wish, M can be described as "Symbian UIQ business and messaging smartphones". | |||
| Any objections? ] (]) 11:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ====Intel Based iMac==== | |||
| That picture does not mess up the formatting and it isn't not necessary. It shows the beautiful iMac being appreciated. Now stop deleting stuff randomly. | |||
| Thank you. If you would like to discuss the matter further message to me. ] ] (]) 09:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == No processor code name or architecture == | |||
| What's wrong with providing the processor code names in the MacBook article? That conveys a lot more about the machine than just that it's a Core 2 or its model number. Also, where was it established that no machines use Napa or Santa Rosa? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Hyundai Timeline == | |||
| Look, please quit reverting the Hyundai timeline back to where it was. Do you honestly expect Hyundai to only be making ONE car next year, when they are continuously expanding their model offerings? Look, unless the automaker otherwise announces that a particular model will be dropped or replaced, it can be safely assumed that the model will be made next year. | |||
| As for the Crystal Ball talk? Look, we're not talking about five, ten, or twenty years down the road. We're talking about ONE year. And Hyundai is far from being Isuzu, who will be withdrawing from the US market next year (they will still be here for commercial trucks, though), more people are buying Hyundai's these days. Just leave the timeline alone unless an official announcement has been made. Thanks.] (]) 18:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==ADP article edits== | |||
| Hello, I've just reverted all of your edits to the ADP article because you're deleting quality writing and information. If you think that certain text needs to be elsewhere in the article, then simply move it. It's not proper wikipedia policy to completely delete text that is well-written and sourced because you think it belongs elsewhere. I do agree with you that the production info for ADP could be included elsewhere in the article, but please stop deleting it. | |||
| Also, Tori Amos herself has talked about how drastic of a departure ADP is compared to her previous work. The way it was recorded and the instrumentation of the songs are evidence of that. You keep deleting info claiming that it's POV, but it's not the case. In this respect, the article is reiterating Amos' own thoughts on it. | |||
| Last, if you want to make major deletions to any article that other people are contributing to on a regular basis, it's a good idea to talk about it in the discussion page for the article, instead of just deleting it without anyone's input. --] (]) 20:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == VX fleet Afd == | |||
| In case you didn't immediately see my response to the Afd, I thought I would just copy what I said there since it more directed at you, as nominator. If you nominate this for deletion, then you are pretty much obliged to nominate every other fleet page for deletion unless you can ''somehow'' prove that the ] page is more worthy of deletion than other fleet pages, which is probably impossible to do. You should also notify ] of this nomination. ]<sub>(])</sub> 23:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Yep, no problem. It's just a bit one-sided if you nominated one when others are exactly the same. Might as well kill multiple birds with one stone! ]<sub>(])</sub> 04:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well at least those pages have substance. I don't find them to be nearly as pointless as the two Virgin ones are. ]<sub>(])</sub> 14:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::The other ones don't seem that bad to me. They're more than just a table or two. ]<sub>(])</sub> 23:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::You do have a point. I mean, there is nothing terribly notable about Singapore airline's fleet that warrants a separate page. The only reason I can think of is space. ]<sub>(])</sub> 00:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Singapore Airlines fleet== | |||
| I Don't think that the registrations of Singapore Airlines is not irrelevant in the page of Singapore Airlines fleet. | |||
| Instead of constantly diverting this discussion all over the place and splitting it into three seperate user's talkpages, kindly consolidate discussion in the article's talkpage itself. I am pretty sure the article's contributors deserve to weight in on the issue as well.--] (]) 17:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I would continue to insist that you follow proper procedures before I engage further in this discussion. The "track record" of any one individual is not for you to use as an excuse to do otherwise.--] (]) 18:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Of course I know there is a discussion there, so why have you continued to engage in private conversations in talkpages, instead of directing them to discuss there? Are you doing things only due to procedural requirements, and not sincere about engaging article contributors? And may I point out quite matter-of-factly that I am not even the primary contributor of that article for several years now despite being its original author? Why are you only interested in directing your comments primarily at me? Was I the only person who showed objection to your unilateral moves in deleting the page? I would like to see all conversations moved to that article's talkpage and I will continue from there. I refuse to engage further via editor's talkpages because this is not fair to those who are involved but unawares of these "sideline discussions".--] (]) 05:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Why delete mention of Canon custom firmware == | |||
| Hello, I added information of third party firmware to the Canon Digital IXUS page because I thought it would be beneficial to users. I see you removed my edit as well as adding a note not to re-add this text. What is your reason for this? Thanks. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Singapore Airlines formal request for mediation (2nd filing) == | |||
| Hi, as the ] in relation to the various issues regarding the ] article was not successful, I have now instigated a request for formal mediation on these issues at MedCom at . As you have been involved in editing this article in direct relation to the various disputed issues and/or have been active in discussion regarding these issues on ], previous dispute resolution attempts, or on the talk pages, I have added you to the involved parties list, so if you agree to participate, please sign your acceptance on that page. Thanks --] <sup>]</sup> 21:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] mediation == | |||
| A ] has been filed with the ] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at ], and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Misplaced Pages, please refer to ]. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, ] 17:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for mediation not accepted== | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:90%" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |A ] to which you were are a party was ] and has been delisted.<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br> | |||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 11:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</small></center> | |||
| == Singapore Airlines formal request for mediation == | |||
| Hi, as ] in relation to the various issues regarding the ] article have not been successful, I have now instigated a further request for formal mediation on these issues at MedCom at . As you have been involved in editing this article in direct relation to the various disputed issues and/or have been active in discussion regarding these issues on ], previous dispute resolution attempts, or on the talk pages, I have added you to the involved parties list, so if you agree to participate, please sign your acceptance on that page. Thanks --] <sup>]</sup> 00:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==] may be deleted== | |||
| Hello Butterfly0fDoom, I know you have actively contributed to articles devoted to Tori Amos, so I wanted to let you know about a discussion to delete the ]. Please provide your thoughts at ]. Many thanks!--] (]) 13:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for mediation accepted== | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:90%" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |A ] to which you were are a party has been ].<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br> | |||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' ] (]) 11:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</small></center> | |||
| == Proposal for layout change of Automotive company timeline templates == | |||
| Having edited a lot of the ], I would like you to read and comment on my ]. –] (]) 15:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of Canon PowerShot Pro== | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process{{#if: Non-notable, unsourced product|  because of the following concern:|.}} | |||
| :<b>Non-notable, unsourced product</b> | |||
| All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 03:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Template:Timeline of MacBook family models == | |||
| You wrote in your revision: "(no need or justification for the incremental updated; after a debacle in the iMac timeline, attempting to put in every single revision would just cause problems later on)" | |||
| I followed that iMac problem which was a mess because people could not seem to decide how to define the iMacs. I guess my point is that when the incremental updates are defined in the respective articles themselves, that problem goes away. In other words, defining updates on a timeline by the dates they were introduced, seems to be exactly what the timeline is there to do. By not showing those incremental updates on the timeline, there is no perspective on the development of the model thus mitigating the effect of using a timeline in the first place. I honestly don't understand how the same problem as on the iMac page will result, which by the way seems to have eventually solved itself. As it stands there is no correlation in the articles between models profiled and the timeline. If anything identifying the updates by "early", "mid" & "late" (as teh Mac community seems to have settled into) solves any sort of editorial conflict. Apple changed the specs, the model update is detailed in the article and without changing the color of the model barset, a marker is dropped to note the revision on the timeline. It actually presents a graphical portrait of the development of a model line which looks rather un-dynamic and static between major model form factors otherwise. However the best way to handle that is not my main concern, more importantly that the timeline represents the model profiles withing the articles. Obviously this is detailed information best reserved for the family group timelines and not complete company timelines. Feel free to move this to the template talk page, I was not sure you'd catch my response there.--] (]) 05:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Whose ] are we gonna do this on? LOL The only response I have is that by including the incremental upgrades on the timeline, you show a history of development and how these developments related to each other. Space is not really a consideration on a ], just as it is not on the ]. As far as the iMac timeline is concerned, the lack of space is going to have to be rectified soon using the complete timeline models, regardless of how the models are specified. When you say PowerBook timeline, I am assuming you mean ]? In which case, this one is a macro timeline in which such detailed distinctions would be inappropriate. So I guess my point is, Apple is updating these models incrementally with some significant changes. The MacBook White already has a whole new graphics chip and processor. That's kind of a big deal in terms of the history of a product. The same is true for all the other updates, introducing a new processor at a minimum. It shows historical change and that the products were not simply released and remained stagnant until the next major design update. If the intent of these timelines is to merely demarcate major model releases, then you've made your point. However, when the article itself discusses and documents these incremental updates and the graphical timeline does not, I see that as a source of confusion which needs some reconciliation. Perhaps a disclaimer footnote on the timeline that spells out incremental upgrades mentioned in the respective articles are omitted from the timeline.--] (]) 04:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == MacBook & Air == | |||
| You say bright green and 'white' (it was actually grey) aren't a good combination, but how is bright green and yellow any better for headaches? Grey is the default table colour for tables on Misplaced Pages, which is why I think it'd most appropriate to show the discontinued models. The yellow is too bright for discontinued models, and I believe a more neutral colour would be appropriate. Maybe a darker grey? I'll give it a go later and give me your feedback so we can come to some type of agreement. Cheers. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Done. <span style="color: #0000FF; text-decoration: underline;">I used the same grey and same green</span> that were present before my changes. This should alleviate any issues with the colour scheme as it's essentially the same as before, just not with bright yellow . I did however leave the other slight tweaks to break up the black text for readability. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::As noted when editing my talk page I like to keep discussions in one place. In response to your comment: if white text on green background is an issue for you then feel free to return it to black. I disagree however that old and new models shouldn't be distinguished, but that's not really an issue as it's been that way on the article for ages now. I simply changed a bright yellow colour to default grey. However I do not know why you think I'd have to change "every computer article" on Misplaced Pages to follow suite? ]<sup>]</sup> 00:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Also please be courteous and avoid reverting valid revisions by other editors (ie me), especially when the matter is in discussion. I returned the yellow colour to default grey as that should not be an issue for your headaches. If it is let's discuss. ]<sup>]</sup> 00:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::OKAY there's no more white on green. The two articles in question are actually the same colour scheme now (as you requested). Luckily I'm a flexible editor, but as an admin I would like to remind you that you should try to avoid being seen as taking 'ownership' of articles. Cheers! ]<sup>]</sup> 01:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Replied on my talk. Hope it's all sorted now, and apologies for any wording that wasn't conveyed well. Good night! ]<sup>]</sup> 01:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == China Airlines == | |||
| Whoever edited the fleet section of China Airlines has totally incorrect information. China Airlines does not have 747 combi. I am unable to undo the posts... going to have to revamp it again. ] (]) 12:43, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I am familiar with the convention that you cited. There have been extensive discussions on the use of the remark "Republic of China (Taiwan)". The style of remarking is ambiguous, and it can be interpreted as Republic of China ''is'' Taiwan. As you are aware, the Republic of China is not necessarily Taiwan. | |||
| That's why after extensive discussions in the past, the current preferred style is ''Republic of China, commonly known as "Taiwan"'', as it is largely undisputed that Taiwan is a common name for the Republic of China, and this style makes it clear that Misplaced Pages is not endorsing the POV that "the ROC = Taiwan".--] (]) 11:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD== | |||
| Your opinion would be appreciated on ]. ]<span style="color:grey;">&</span>] 01:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==13" subsection== | |||
| I might have to disagree, because historically and consistently the 13" MacBook has been Apple's best selling notebook. If that remains the case (as is likely), it will certainly merit a subsection. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Unibody MBP sections == | |||
| Hello Butterfly0fdoom, | |||
| As stated on the MacBook Pro's ], I am currently fiddling with a new format for the contreversial formatting of the Unibody section. I'm currently trying to perfect a timeline-like format in ]. Tell me what you think on ]! This will hopefully bring about a compromise to satisfy you, Nja247, and me. When time allows, please take a look and give suggestions! Thanks, ] (]) 21:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I now think that ] is ready for integration with the MBP article (replacing the old content). Please tell me what you think of it on my talk. Thanks, ] (]) 21:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Do you think I can just go ahead and integrate it or is there some sort of rule about doing so? ] (]) 20:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] is the final product of our labors :). Unless you have any concerns, I'm putting it on on the 24th. Thanks! ] (]) 03:33, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Airplaneman}} | |||
| ] (]) 16:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, ] has made some edits to ] that I'm very confused about, and has done something weird to ]. Can you help him sort it out, please? It goes over my head. Thanks, ] <sup>(])</sup> 13:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Okay, thanks. ] <sup>(])</sup> 17:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. The error went back to the creation and evidently a software update uncovered it.--] (]) 21:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Airplaneman}} | |||
| Nja hasn't responded yet- I think he's busy. I guess I'll wait for his opinion before continuing with the integration. ] (]) 14:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Airplaneman}} | |||
| Sorry for cluttering your page with tb temps. Here is the message for your convenience, though do please respond on my talk: | |||
| OK, I was wrong. Nja did respond. I have followed ] and . Now, about the timeline-like part, where do you think I should go with that? ] (]) 00:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC) ] (]) 00:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Airplaneman}} | |||
| Please respond asap. Thanks. ] ''<sup>]</sup>'' 04:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == MBP == | |||
| Hello, Butterfly0fdoom. Just to let you know, I've posted our disagreement on ]. 05:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Hello Butterfly0fdoom. I would like to notify you that the request for ] regarding the dispute about the MacBook Pro section format has been removed without any opinion given. Therefore I have asked for an opinion ]. ] ''<sup>]</sup>'' 01:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == San Francisco International Airport GAR notice == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a ]. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are ].--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 01:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Removal of MacBookPro Model Identifiers == | |||
| Hello- | |||
| You recently removed some data I listed concerning the MacBookPro models. I added this because this mechanism has been used increasingly both in development as well as support in identifying the delineation between models. Admittedly, I need to find specific documentation of this justification. You mention in your comments that this would only be known by people who delve to the inside, but it is one of the first things listed and asked for by tech support in the ]. It is also the first thing listed that identifies which model revision one has. | |||
| This compiled information is also relatively difficult to find in any one place outside Apple. As a result it seemed to be as important as any other information to show the differences between released models. | |||
| I wanted to address this to you directly for your opinion and to appeal to you to see my motivation for adding this data. (I'm highly against causing edit wars) | |||
| Thank you for your time and consideration | |||
| -Andrei Freeman | |||
| ] (]) 20:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == About "Template:List of iPod models" == | |||
| I think the new iPod touch is still 2G, because Apple never announces that the new touch are 3rd Generation, while the new nano, which comes together with touch, is regarded as 5G officially by Apple. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Thank you for your responce. And I've find a clue that the new iPod touch is still 2G, please view the comment page of ], thank you. ] (]) 13:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello, NJA. I'm just letting you know that I have nominated MacBook Pro, an article you to, for Good Article status. The review can be found at ]. Cheers, ] ''<sup>]</sup>'' 23:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :It's a GA now. Yay. ]] 20:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] Revival == | |||
| ]Hello, {{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}! You've listed yourself as an active member of ], which is currently seeing very little activity. We are trying to revive the project and your help would be appreciated. To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's ]. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. Hope to see you in the "active" column! For more information on how to help the project, visit the ] section at ]! · ] (]) 02:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0038 --> | |||
| == ] Role Call == | |||
| ]Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! You've listed yourself as an active member of ], which is currently being revived. Your help would be appreciated! To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's ]. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. The role call will end May 31; please move your name now if you are still interested. For more information on how to help the project, visit the ] section at ]! · ]04:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0042 --> | |||
| == China Airlines == | |||
| I dont really think that the table fits in the page. This is because the amount of seats on each type of aircraft is already discussed in the section fleet. Looking at the section on cabin classes of most of the airline pages on wikipedia, none used table. Most described in paragraphs. Also, it is impossible to give detailed description in tables. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact ] to request that the administrator ] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 21:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == October 2011 == | |||
| ] Thank you for ] to ]. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an ], which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to ]. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for ]). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ''Do you have an explanation for removing the 5th Generation specs? | |||
| '' ] ] 14:24, 5 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Republic of China article == | |||
| Since you said on your ] that you are from the Republic of China, I guess you are interested to share your view at ]. Thanks for your attention. ] (]) 11:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC) | |||