| Revision as of 13:25, 29 March 2012 view sourceTnxman307 (talk | contribs)64,361 edits qury← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:06, 30 March 2012 view source Doug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,241 edits →Comments by other users: nothing to see hereNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
| ], ok? If he wanted to disguise those account I'm guessing he could have picked better names for them. Hopefully this is just confusion on the part of the editor bringing this here. Alternative accounts are not forbidden. ] (]) 15:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 15:06, 30 March 2012
Mathsci
Mathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci/Archive.
– This SPI case is open.
29 March 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Mathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Altmathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Alternative-mathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Clear enough from names and the usage of subpages. The two alternative accounts are used only to store material relating to old grudges of Mathsci. Presumably this is to avoid legitimate scrutiny of battleground behavior. Southend sofa (talk) 06:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. WP:AGF, ok? If he wanted to disguise those account I'm guessing he could have picked better names for them. Hopefully this is just confusion on the part of the editor bringing this here. Alternative accounts are not forbidden. Dougweller (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I see no multiple account abuse here. One account is stale, the other fairly clearly identifies itself on its userpage. Is there some other issue which I've missed? TNXMan 13:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories: