Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:06, 30 March 2012 view sourceDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,249 edits →Comments by other users: nothing to see here← Previous edit Revision as of 06:00, 1 April 2012 view source Beyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,485 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>
], ok? If he wanted to disguise those account I'm guessing he could have picked better names for them. Hopefully this is just confusion on the part of the editor bringing this here. Alternative accounts are not forbidden. ] (]) 15:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC) ], ok? If he wanted to disguise those account I'm guessing he could have picked better names for them. Hopefully this is just confusion on the part of the editor bringing this here. Alternative accounts are not forbidden. ] (]) 15:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
:This SPI report was the editor's first contribution in a year. Their contrib history is quite interesting - like an account that's been put away for a rainy day. ] (]) 06:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 06:00, 1 April 2012

Mathsci

Mathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci/Archive.

– This SPI case is open.

29 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Clear enough from names and the usage of subpages. The two alternative accounts are used only to store material relating to old grudges of Mathsci. Presumably this is to avoid legitimate scrutiny of battleground behavior. Southend sofa (talk) 06:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. WP:AGF, ok? If he wanted to disguise those account I'm guessing he could have picked better names for them. Hopefully this is just confusion on the part of the editor bringing this here. Alternative accounts are not forbidden. Dougweller (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

This SPI report was the editor's first contribution in a year. Their contrib history is quite interesting - like an account that's been put away for a rainy day. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I see no multiple account abuse here. One account is stale, the other fairly clearly identifies itself on its userpage. Is there some other issue which I've missed? TNXMan 13:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Categories: