| Revision as of 01:37, 2 April 2012 editWillietell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users917 edits →01 April 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:02, 10 April 2019 edit undoAhechtbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors75,726 editsm Task 5: Fix LintErrorsTag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
| *{{Decline}} - We do not use CU to prove innocence, and I don't see a sigle shred of evidence on two long term users. Closing. -- ]]</font></font> 09:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | *{{Decline}} - We do not use CU to prove innocence, and I don't see a sigle shred of evidence on two long term users. Closing. -- ]] 09:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *{{clerknote}} users in general should be aware that "accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence" can be considered a ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | *{{clerknote}} users in general should be aware that "accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence" can be considered a ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 12:02, 10 April 2019
Jeffro77
Jeffro77 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
01 April 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Jeffro77 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- BlackCab (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Willietell (talk · contribs) claims that I am using editor BlackCab (talk · contribs) as a sockpuppet, and that I also have several other user IDs. However, Willietell claims that he 'doesn't care' enough to prove it. He has made this claim to discredit me at an ANI, so I want this matter swiftly cleared up to show he is lying. Thanks. Jeffro77 (talk) 04:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- I would like to state for the record that I never requested this SPI and have never actually stated that I knew the two users were sockpuppets, only that I suspected this (in a recent ANI discussion related to their seemingly tandem relationship ), but lacked any concrete evidence to the prove such a relationship. I have also clearly stated that I really didn't care if such a relationship did in fact exist, thus to bring here is sophomoric at best, especially since I'm sure that both seasoned editors already knew that CU would not be used to "prove innocence", this this entire process has been a waste of the administrators limited time. I apologize for having been a part of such a waste of time. Willietell (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have also never made reference to such suspicion on any page other than the ANI and my on talk page when discussing with the two editors in question, I have never brought my suspicion up as a topic for discussion on any article talk page. Just FYI. Willietell (talk) 01:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
What can I say? I live in Melbourne, Australia and I have gained the impression from his past edits that Jeffro77 also lives in Australia, though we seem to edit in slightly different time zones. I have never met him. I sent him an email once through the WP link on his talk page and he replied. I have disagreed with him in the past and he has opposed my edits in the past. A month or so ago he chided me over intemperate comments I made to another editor. The suggestion that I am a sockpuppet of Jeffro77 (which Willietell first made a few weeks ago) is baseless, fanciful and .... just weird. BlackCab (talk) 05:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk declined - We do not use CU to prove innocence, and I don't see a sigle shred of evidence on two long term users. Closing. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 09:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Clerk note: users in general should be aware that "accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence" can be considered a personal attack. Spitfire 09:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
