| Revision as of 00:23, 16 April 2006 editTipPt (talk | contribs)2,048 edits →"Relevant quotes"← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:45, 7 May 2006 edit undoJakew (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,277 edits Three revert ruleNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :You have not operated in good faith.] 00:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | :You have not operated in good faith.] 00:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi Tip, | |||
| You've just breached the three revert rule in ]. In case you're not aware, you must not make more than three reverts to an article in any 24-hour period. If you do, the usual response is for you to be blocked from editing for 24 hours. | |||
| This includes partial reverts, and applies to ''any'' revert to the article. | |||
| In the following edits, you reverted changes to the section on risks, specifically the paragraph beginning "While the risks of circumcision procedure-related complications are very low..." | |||
| 21:21, May 6 | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Circumcision&diff=51883706&oldid=51882657 | |||
| 15:19, May 7 | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Circumcision&diff=51989328&oldid=51980027 | |||
| 18:38, May 7 | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Circumcision&diff=52015381&oldid=52014969 | |||
| Finally, you reverted all changes in this edit: | |||
| 19:16, May 7 | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Circumcision&diff=52020327&oldid=52015381 | |||
| The correct thing to do now is to revert your last change (a self-revert is considered ok). Assuming you do, I'm happy not to report this violation, and you won't get blocked. ] 19:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:45, 7 May 2006
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, TipPt. It's nice to see someone interested in improving Circumcision with properly sourced information. But could I ask you to sign your comments? Just type ~~~~ (that's four tilde's, the upper symbol on the key to the left of the #1 key), and Misplaced Pages will automatically sign your user name and the time of your comment to the article. This helps us keep track of who said what, and also makes it easier to leave replies on each others' talk pages so we can work together more effectively. Thanks a lot, and good luck. :) -Kasreyn 10:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
RFC
Alienus 02:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Your comment at Talk:Circumcision
There is no need to shout, nor make unpleasant remarks. If a page needs to be improved, it is not appropriate to leave a message at a different talk page. Instead, explain your concerns at the appropriate talk page, and we can try to address them. I'm more than happy to work with you on this, as I'm sure are other editors, but you must use talk pages for their intended purpose. Jakew 10:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- The whole table is opinion or misleading and needs to be removed.TipPt 15:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- Explain why you think so at Talk:Sexual effects of circumcision, and we'll discuss it. Jakew 15:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
"Relevant quotes"
The purpose of the talk pages is to discuss an article and proposed changes to it. It is not to present evidence of perceived wrongdoing, nor to duplicate large sections of earlier discussions. It's not clear what your purpose was in creating the section, but I have moved it to . Please don't bother replying unless you care to do so in good faith. It wastes my time and yours. Jakew 20:12, 15 April 2006 UTC)
- You have not operated in good faith.TipPt 00:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule
Hi Tip,
You've just breached the three revert rule in circumcision. In case you're not aware, you must not make more than three reverts to an article in any 24-hour period. If you do, the usual response is for you to be blocked from editing for 24 hours.
This includes partial reverts, and applies to any revert to the article.
In the following edits, you reverted changes to the section on risks, specifically the paragraph beginning "While the risks of circumcision procedure-related complications are very low..."
21:21, May 6 http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Circumcision&diff=51883706&oldid=51882657
15:19, May 7 http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Circumcision&diff=51989328&oldid=51980027
18:38, May 7 http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Circumcision&diff=52015381&oldid=52014969
Finally, you reverted all changes in this edit:
19:16, May 7 http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Circumcision&diff=52020327&oldid=52015381
The correct thing to do now is to revert your last change (a self-revert is considered ok). Assuming you do, I'm happy not to report this violation, and you won't get blocked. Jakew 19:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)