| Revision as of 21:06, 19 June 2012 editDangerousPanda (talk | contribs)38,827 edits →Try this again...: no← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:40, 20 June 2012 edit undoThewolfchild (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,891 edits →Try this again...Next edit → | ||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
| * The block was June 7th. It is now June 19th and you continue to refuse to respond to my requests for clarification. I will take your continued silence as tacit acknowledgement on your part that the block was, in fact, ''not'' justified. Thank you. - ''''']''''' 18:14, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | * The block was June 7th. It is now June 19th and you continue to refuse to respond to my requests for clarification. I will take your continued silence as tacit acknowledgement on your part that the block was, in fact, ''not'' justified. Thank you. - ''''']''''' 18:14, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | :: I think the part in the above section that says "I already explained it on your talkpage" means they're not going to explain again. |
||
| * Sarek? - ''''']''''' 01:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == User:Bwilkins == | |||
| ⚫ | :: I think the part in the above section that says "I already explained it on your talkpage" means they're not going to explain again. So V's lack of reply is tacit acknowledgement that they ] that you have the capacity to have read the original explanation. Further hounding of of anyone regarding this can (and will) lead to additional blocks for harassment (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span>]) 21:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::: "''I think the part in the above section that says "I already explained it on your talkpage" means they're not going to explain again.''" | |||
| ::: - Needless sarcasm. Commenting on a post that was not directed to you. | |||
| ::: "''So V's lack of reply is tacit acknowledgement that they ] that you have the capacity to have read the original explanation.''" | |||
| ::: - More sarcasm and a veiled insult of another editor's intellect. | |||
| ::: "''Further hounding of of anyone regarding this can (and will) lead to additional blocks for harassment''" | |||
| ::: - A threat. | |||
| ::: Wow <s>Sarek</s>, um... er, I mean BW, that's quite the post. Who's gonna block me? ''You''? For what? I'd like you to show me just how this is harrassment, while at the same time showing that what you're doing isn't. I stand by my queries, I don't not see how that handful of quotes constitutes a block. It's certainly not an explanation... it's just quotes. There are also many questions I asked in and following the ANI that went unanswered and there were issues with some others peoples conduct that I raised that were not addressed. Quite frankly, that ANI was a piss-poor crock of ]. I want answers. | |||
| :::Now you'll notice I've given you your own little section so that you can troll away and blather on about whatever nonsense you like as the self-imposed official spokeswoman for the all so silent Sarek. Perhaps now you'll refrain from addressing issues that do not concern you. Have a nice day. - ''''']''''' 01:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Heads up at ] == | == Heads up at ] == | ||
Revision as of 01:40, 20 June 2012
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
|
Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
| Please add new comments in new sections, e.g., by clicking here. Thanks. SarekOfVulcan |
|---|
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page.
Deletion request
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Notification
Hello, Sarek. I just wanted to remind you to add Ottomanist block into ARBMAC log, as he was block per arbmac probation. All best. --WhiteWriter 21:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Additional information based on a new publication
What or who is BLP? And why, in your opinion, is the source I referenced (http://www.hprweb.com/2012/05/same-sex-attractions-in-youth-and-their-right-to-informed-consent/) not a "reliable" source?Sallysue1159 (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- BLP is the Biographies of living persons policy. A blog repost of a talk given at a conference is not a reliable source for the actions (or lack thereof) of another person. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
But the reference cited is from a paper that is well researched with 37 references not from a talk. (The paper in question was also presented as the basis for a talk.) Please look at the cited reference again (http://www.hprweb.com/2012/05/same-sex-attractions-in-youth-and-their-right-to-informed-consent/). Given that Dr. Richard Fitzgibbons serves on an external sub-committee that serves an advisory purpose to the American College of Pediatricians (http://factsaboutyouth.com/about-us/)he would be privy to the information stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.222.218.78 (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- Feel free to ask at the reliable sources noticeboard if that is a reliable source for that statement. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:42, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Re-formating
Thanks so much with your help on the Jessicka article. It looks much better. Lifespan9 (talk) 21:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Feedback box
From five months ago: "Testing - I'm the primary editor of this article, so this shouldn't be treated as real feedback." (ref) They just unveiled this page and are asking for feedback. Once you have figured out how it works, check out the "What do you think of this page" link in the upper right corner of the page. Jesse V. (talk) 17:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Priscilla K. Coleman
Thanks for the polite heads up regarding Priscilla K. Coleman! Nice still have one's head after committing such a faux pas. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
User:Thewolfchild
Hello SarekOfVulcan. If you blocked due to this edit or my conversation with User:Thewolfchild at ANI, you can unblock, I'm not offended and I don't think the block is fair. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
It's called a "response" -- notice the quotation formatting? -- and a prediction of the inevitable result of his current course. If he doesn't like it, let him complain. --Calton | Talk 03:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
It's called a "joke". And since when are people punished for what they might do? - thewolfchild 16:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC) (btw - don't you have your own talk page?)
User:SarekOfVulcan
Now that I've given you a couple days to cool down, perhaps you care to explain the block? Thank you. - thewolfchild 16:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- I already explained it in detail on your talkpage. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- You did? Where? - thewolfchild 18:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Still waiting... - thewolfchild 03:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I'm sure you read this part of your talkpage before starting the badgering? The surprise is how short the block was, considering the consensus at ANI. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:07, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- You again? Talk about trolling. How flattering to have my own personal wiki-stalker. If Sarek contributed that, perhaps he should have signed it. (as per wiki-policy... you guys are pretty selective about what policies you follow, don't don't follow, enforce, ignore, huh?). Now, BW, as much as we all appreciate your thoughtful comments, I must ask, are you Sarek's personal spokeswoman? Can't he speak for himself?
- How about it Sarek? Any reason why you don't seem able to provide any justification for the block? I'm on your talk page, asking you a direct question and I would appreciate a response from you. - thewolfchild 20:31, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- You could only hope to have me as your own personal stalker. As my comment said, I stalk this talkpage. Dream on though. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- - "You could only hope to have me as your own personal stalker." Wow. So humble...
- - "I stalk this talkpage". Hence the reason you are all over my talkpage and my ANI. What's next? Showing up at my house? Peeking in my windows?
- - "Dream on though." Ugh.
- I hope things get better for you soon. Then maybe you'll find more contructive use of your time. Have a nice day. - thewolfchild 22:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Try this again...
- Sarek, Could you please provide some sort of rationale for your block? It does not appear to be justified to me. Thank you. - thewolfchild 22:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC).
- The block was June 7th. It is now June 19th and you continue to refuse to respond to my requests for clarification. I will take your continued silence as tacit acknowledgement on your part that the block was, in fact, not justified. Thank you. - thewolfchild 18:14, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sarek? - thewolfchild 01:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
User:Bwilkins
- I think the part in the above section that says "I already explained it on your talkpage" means they're not going to explain again. So V's lack of reply is tacit acknowledgement that they WP:AGF that you have the capacity to have read the original explanation. Further hounding of of anyone regarding this can (and will) lead to additional blocks for harassment (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- "I think the part in the above section that says "I already explained it on your talkpage" means they're not going to explain again."
- - Needless sarcasm. Commenting on a post that was not directed to you.
- "So V's lack of reply is tacit acknowledgement that they WP:AGF that you have the capacity to have read the original explanation."
- - More sarcasm and a veiled insult of another editor's intellect.
- "Further hounding of of anyone regarding this can (and will) lead to additional blocks for harassment"
- - A threat.
- Wow
Sarek, um... er, I mean BW, that's quite the post. Who's gonna block me? You? For what? I'd like you to show me just how this is harrassment, while at the same time showing that what you're doing isn't. I stand by my queries, I don't not see how that handful of quotes constitutes a block. It's certainly not an explanation... it's just quotes. There are also many questions I asked in and following the ANI that went unanswered and there were issues with some others peoples conduct that I raised that were not addressed. Quite frankly, that ANI was a piss-poor crock of crap. I want answers.
- Wow
- Now you'll notice I've given you your own little section so that you can troll away and blather on about whatever nonsense you like as the self-imposed official spokeswoman for the all so silent Sarek. Perhaps now you'll refrain from addressing issues that do not concern you. Have a nice day. - thewolfchild 01:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Heads up at Freemasonry in Turkey
I seem to remember that back when "Lightbringer" was active, the anti-masonic website "Freemasonry Watch" was placed on the black list (not sure if it still is)... in any case, we have an editor who is repeatedly adding it to the ELs at the Freemasonry in Turkey article. I have already removed it twice, and don't want to be lured into an edit war over it. Blueboar (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, he seems to be spaming it in several articles... I have removed for now. Blueboar (talk) 21:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Major-thirds tuning
Hi Sarek!
Please use your administrative mojo to move all-thirds tuning to major-thirds tunin
A quick move would prevent headaches for reviewers at its DYK nomination.
Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 19:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
P.S. Is there an article on the Vulcan stringed instrument?
- Done. There's only a redirect here for the Vulcan Lyre -- Memory Alpha has more details. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:47, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion, for the article-movement, and the information. Memory alpha does have more information and pictures.
- Live long and prosper,
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)