Misplaced Pages

User talk:Roux: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:47, 7 July 2012 view sourceKeystoneridin (talk | contribs)Rollbackers2,261 edits →Okay, I get it.: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 21:50, 7 July 2012 view source Roux (talk | contribs)23,636 edits →Okay, I get it.: Correcting the false information you are providing is not harassmentNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


Enough is enough. I realize you are angry about the article, fine. But posting to intervene on other communications which do not concern you IS harassment. Please do stop. This is getting ridiculous.<span style="border: 1px solid #CC3333">]]</span> 21:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC) Enough is enough. I realize you are angry about the article, fine. But posting to intervene on other communications which do not concern you IS harassment. Please do stop. This is getting ridiculous.<span style="border: 1px solid #CC3333">]]</span> 21:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
:It is categorically ''not'' harassment to correct the false information you are providing to other editors. →&nbsp;]&nbsp;]<small>&nbsp;21:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 21:50, 7 July 2012


roux

main • talk • dashboard • sandbox • edits • email • refresh
archiving performed by cluebot every five days // online


talk archives
2008 / apr-aug / a / s / o / n / d
2009 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d
2010 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d
2011 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d
2012 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d

Which/that

I am pleased that you reverted from 'that' to 'which' on the Battle of Waterloo article. The spurious convention, often slavishly applied in the USA, insisting that 'which' is only used in conjuction with a comma is stifling good expression in English. I particularly despise journal editors/proofreaders who change my use of 'which' to 'that'. Urselius (talk) 07:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I get it.

Enough is enough. I realize you are angry about the article, fine. But posting to intervene on other communications which do not concern you IS harassment. Please do stop. This is getting ridiculous.Keystoneridin (speak) 21:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

It is categorically not harassment to correct the false information you are providing to other editors. → ROUX ₪ 21:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)