Revision as of 23:57, 12 July 2012 editMagioladitis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers908,576 editsm clean up using AWB (8101)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 01:34, 22 June 2013 edit undoKhazar2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers191,299 edits →removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV: new sectionNext edit → |
Line 23: |
Line 23: |
|
|
|
|
|
(outdenting) The problem is not just one section. It is that the point of view of over 99% of the residents of Hebron is not represented in the article. The only points of view represented are those of the settlers and of Israeli officialdom. What was the reaction of the local Palestinian population to this settlement? What have the Hebron council and Palestinian Authority had to say about it? The article is based on 15 Israeli sources and one Australian - what about Palestinian and other Arab sources? Have they really written nothing about this? These are all questions that the article leaves unanswered, and without answering them it can't be considered balanced. And please don't tell me that the answer is to remedy it myself - I don't know the answers to these questions and don't read either Arabic or Hebrew so don't have access to the sources that I would need to find out. I am replacing the POV tag because without any Palestinian perspective the article can't be said to present a ]. ] (]) 17:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
|
(outdenting) The problem is not just one section. It is that the point of view of over 99% of the residents of Hebron is not represented in the article. The only points of view represented are those of the settlers and of Israeli officialdom. What was the reaction of the local Palestinian population to this settlement? What have the Hebron council and Palestinian Authority had to say about it? The article is based on 15 Israeli sources and one Australian - what about Palestinian and other Arab sources? Have they really written nothing about this? These are all questions that the article leaves unanswered, and without answering them it can't be considered balanced. And please don't tell me that the answer is to remedy it myself - I don't know the answers to these questions and don't read either Arabic or Hebrew so don't have access to the sources that I would need to find out. I am replacing the POV tag because without any Palestinian perspective the article can't be said to present a ]. ] (]) 17:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== removing POV tag with no active discussion per ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at ]: |
|
|
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever: |
|
|
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved |
|
|
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given |
|
|
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant. |
|
|
|
|
|
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- ] (]) 01:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC) |
(outdenting) The problem is not just one section. It is that the point of view of over 99% of the residents of Hebron is not represented in the article. The only points of view represented are those of the settlers and of Israeli officialdom. What was the reaction of the local Palestinian population to this settlement? What have the Hebron council and Palestinian Authority had to say about it? The article is based on 15 Israeli sources and one Australian - what about Palestinian and other Arab sources? Have they really written nothing about this? These are all questions that the article leaves unanswered, and without answering them it can't be considered balanced. And please don't tell me that the answer is to remedy it myself - I don't know the answers to these questions and don't read either Arabic or Hebrew so don't have access to the sources that I would need to find out. I am replacing the POV tag because without any Palestinian perspective the article can't be said to present a neutral point of view. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)