| Revision as of 09:13, 31 July 2012 editArmbrust (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers326,145 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:57, 31 July 2012 edit undoDeryck Chan (talk | contribs)Administrators22,733 edits →Re: Justicejayant AN/I: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| ==Notice of Dispute resolution discussion== | ==Notice of Dispute resolution discussion== | ||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "]". Thank you.<!--Template:DRN-notice--> --] <sup><font color="#E3A857">]</font></sup><sub> <font color="#008000">]</font></sub> 09:13, 31 July 2012 (UTC) | Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "]". Thank you.<!--Template:DRN-notice--> --] <sup><font color="#E3A857">]</font></sup><sub> <font color="#008000">]</font></sub> 09:13, 31 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: Justicejayant AN/I == | |||
| * | |||
| Thanks for telling me. I apologize on behalf of all the regulars at RFPP for disappointing you. However, when socking is the only cause for the protection request and there is ''any'' doubt that the accused IP-hopper may not be a banned user, we generally wait until the case is proved at SPI or ANI before taking action. This is because RFPP, being a low reader-volume requests page, has been abused by partisan editors to bar off groups of opponent editors in the past in the name of "socking". ]] 16:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:57, 31 July 2012
| This is Lothar von Richthofen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives |
|
Archive 1: 2010 |
The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed 09:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar
Thanks for the barnstar for my work on the Vladimir Lenin page; I'll gradually keep on working on it until it reacher the heights of FA status! (Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:45, 29 July 2012 (UTC))
FAGGOT
Your userbooxes, your tastes in literature, music, politics, everything indicates to me how you are a very massive fucking faggot, jack of all trades - master of none, выскочка. I hope you die of cancer. Too bad the Soviets didn't exterminate your entire family album --Diefromevileye (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
July 2012
Your recent editing history at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Armbrust, B.Ed. The Undertaker 20–0 08:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Libyan_Civil_War, Talk:Libyan_civil_war". Thank you. --Armbrust, B.Ed. The Undertaker 20–0 09:13, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Re: Justicejayant AN/I
Thanks for telling me. I apologize on behalf of all the regulars at RFPP for disappointing you. However, when socking is the only cause for the protection request and there is any doubt that the accused IP-hopper may not be a banned user, we generally wait until the case is proved at SPI or ANI before taking action. This is because RFPP, being a low reader-volume requests page, has been abused by partisan editors to bar off groups of opponent editors in the past in the name of "socking". Deryck C. 16:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)