Misplaced Pages

User talk:124.169.68.39: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:36, 10 August 2012 editBretonbanquet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,607 edits new section  Revision as of 22:22, 10 August 2012 edit undoMoxy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors130,044 edits WP:3RR: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==AC/DC== ==AC/DC==
The piece you're adding has nothing to do with the band. The source you posted doesn't mention the band, and AC/DC can mean a number of things, not just the band. Unless it has a direct, and notable, relevance to the band, it doesn't go in the article. I'll be taking it out again shortly - do not put it back. ] (]) 21:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC) The piece you're adding has nothing to do with the band. The source you posted doesn't mention the band, and AC/DC can mean a number of things, not just the band. Unless it has a direct, and notable, relevance to the band, it doesn't go in the article. I'll be taking it out again shortly - do not put it back. ] (]) 21:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

Pls read '''<big>WP:3RR]]'''</big> - Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be ] from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a ] called the '''three-revert rule''' ('''3RR'''), the violation of which often leads to a block. The three-revert rule states:

{{divbox|blue|radius=4em||An editor must not perform '''more than three reverts''' on a '''single page''' within a '''24-hour period'''. Undoing other editors—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See below for exemptions.}}</br>
...22:22, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:22, 10 August 2012

AC/DC

The piece you're adding has nothing to do with the band. The source you posted doesn't mention the band, and AC/DC can mean a number of things, not just the band. Unless it has a direct, and notable, relevance to the band, it doesn't go in the article. I'll be taking it out again shortly - do not put it back. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

WP:3RR

Pls read WP:3RR]] - Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule (3RR), the violation of which often leads to a block. The three-revert rule states:

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing other editors—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See below for exemptions.


...22:22, 10 August 2012 (UTC)