| Revision as of 14:18, 29 April 2006 editLastexit (talk | contribs)154 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:14, 29 April 2006 edit undoLastexit (talk | contribs)154 edits adding to comments re new additionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Removing details inserted by user concerning naked short-selling, which as stated were skewed entirely to the "anti-shorting" position. Interested users can go to the ] page, where a consensus article is being hammered out. I've also removed a paragraph of hagiography and unduly self-promotional and does not belong in a Misplaced Pages profile. --] 02:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | Removing details inserted by user concerning naked short-selling, which as stated were skewed entirely to the "anti-shorting" position. Interested users can go to the ] page, where a consensus article is being hammered out. I've also removed a paragraph of hagiography and unduly self-promotional and does not belong in a Misplaced Pages profile. --] 02:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I've added some details re recent controversies and widespread press coverage. --] 14:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC) | I've added some details re recent controversies and widespread press coverage. Also I did a bit of reassembly of the article, which I think was a bit disorganized. Tried my best to be as neutral as possible. Let me know what you think. --] 14:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:14, 29 April 2006
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Removing details inserted by user concerning naked short-selling, which as stated were skewed entirely to the "anti-shorting" position. Interested users can go to the naked short selling page, where a consensus article is being hammered out. I've also removed a paragraph of hagiography and unduly self-promotional and does not belong in a Misplaced Pages profile. --Tomstoner 02:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
I've added some details re recent controversies and widespread press coverage. Also I did a bit of reassembly of the article, which I think was a bit disorganized. Tried my best to be as neutral as possible. Let me know what you think. --Lastexit 14:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)