Revision as of 01:29, 17 August 2012 editThirdright (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,531 edits →Please take notice: AN3 notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:21, 17 August 2012 edit undoGeorgewilliamherbert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,680 edits →Please take notice: blocked for 24 hrs.Next edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Please take notice == | == Please take notice == | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']''' on the article ] in that you have reverted more than three times (, , , and ). Users who ] or refuse to ] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the ] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the ] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains ] among editors. If unsuccessful then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice. Regards, ] (]) 00:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']''' on the article ] in that you have reverted more than three times (, , , and ). Users who ] or refuse to ] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the ] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the ] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains ] among editors. If unsuccessful then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice. Regards, ] (]) 00:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
:On review - you '''clearly and unambiguously''' were edit warring on the article and appear on first impression to have created this account yesterday, specifically to do this activity. | |||
:This behavior is unacceptable on Misplaced Pages. I am blocking you for 24 hrs at this time. If you continue disruptive activity the account will be blocked permanently. ] (]) 02:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
:<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== |
Revision as of 02:21, 17 August 2012
Regarding your recent addition of material to an article, please see Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Attempted WP:BLP violation in our left-wing terrorism article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Please take notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war on the article Left-wing terrorism in that you have reverted more than three times (here, here, here, and here). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 00:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- On review - you clearly and unambiguously were edit warring on the article and appear on first impression to have created this account yesterday, specifically to do this activity.
- This behavior is unacceptable on Misplaced Pages. I am blocking you for 24 hrs at this time. If you continue disruptive activity the account will be blocked permanently. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.