| Revision as of 13:32, 6 September 2012 edit204.234.247.101 (talk) →Usage in Roman lawTag: section blanking← Previous edit |
Revision as of 13:32, 6 September 2012 edit undo204.234.247.101 (talk) →Usage in Marxist theoryTag: section blankingNext edit → |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
|
|
|
|
|
The '''proletariat''' (from ] {{lang|la|''proletarius''}}, a citizen of the lowest class) is a term used to identify a lower ], usually the ]; a member of such a class is '''proletarian'''. Originally it was identified as those people who had no ] other than their children. |
|
The '''proletariat''' (from ] {{lang|la|''proletarius''}}, a citizen of the lowest class) is a term used to identify a lower ], usually the ]; a member of such a class is '''proletarian'''. Originally it was identified as those people who had no ] other than their children. |
|
|
|
|
==Usage in Marxist theory== |
|
|
] |
|
|
{{Marxism}} |
|
|
|
|
|
In ] theory, the proletariat is the class of a ] society that does not have ownership of the ] and whose only means of subsistence is to sell their ]<ref>http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch06.htm</ref> for a ] or ]. Proletarians are wage-workers, while some refer to those who receive salaries as the ''salariat''. For ], however, wage labor may involve getting a salary rather than a wage ''per se''. Marxism sees the proletariat and ] (capitalist class) as occupying conflicting positions, since workers automatically wish their wages to be as high as possible, while owners and their proxies wish for wages (costs) to be as low as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
In Marxist theory, the borders between the proletariat and some layers of the ], who rely primarily but not exclusively on self-employment at an income no different from an ordinary wage or below it – and the ], who are not in legal employment – are not necessarily well defined. Intermediate positions are possible, where some wage-labour for an employer combines with self-employment. While the class to which each individual person belongs is often hard to determine, from the standpoint of society as a whole, taken in its movement (i.e. history), the class divisions are incontestable; the easiest proof of their existence is the ] – strikes, for instance. While an employee may be subjectively unsure of his class belonging, when his workmates come out on strike he is objectively forced to follow one class (his workmates, i.e. the proletariat) over the other (management, i.e. the bourgeoisie). Marx makes a clear distinction between proletariat as salaried workers, which he sees a progressive class, and Lumpenproletariat, "rag-proletariat", the poorest and outcasts of the society, such as beggars, tricksters, entertainers, buskers, criminals and prostitutes, which he considers a retrograde class.<ref></ref><ref>Marx, Karl. The Communist Manifesto, part I, Bourgeois and Proletarians. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm</ref> ] parties have often struggled over the question of whether they should seek to organize and represent all the lower classes, or just the wage-earning proletariat. |
|
|
|
|
|
According to Marxism, capitalism is a system based on the ] of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie. This exploitation takes place as follows: the workers, who own no means of production of their own, must use the means of production that are property of others in order to produce, and, consequently, earn their living. Instead of hiring those means of production, they themselves get hired by capitalists and work for them, producing goods or services. These goods or services become the property of the capitalist, who sells them at the market. |
|
|
|
|
|
One part of the wealth produced is used to pay the workers' wages (variable costs), another part to renew the means of production (constant costs) while the third part, ] is split between the capitalist's private takings (profit), and the money used to pay rents, taxes, interests, etc. Surplus value is the difference between the wealth that the proletariat produces through its work, and the wealth it consumes to survive and to provide labor to the capitalist companies.<ref>Marx, Karl. The Capital, volume 1, chapter 6. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch06.htm</ref> A part of the surplus value is used to renew or increase the means of production, either in quantity or quality (i.e., it is turned into ]), and is called capitalised surplus value.<ref>Luxemburg, Rosa. The Accumulation of Capital. Chapter 6, Enlarged Reproduction, http://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1913/accumulation-capital/ch06.htm</ref> What remains is consumed by the capitalist class. |
|
|
|
|
|
The commodities that proletarians produce and capitalists sell are valued for the amount of ] embodied in them. The same goes for the workers' ] itself: it is valued, not for the amount of wealth it produces, but for the amount of labor necessary to produce and reproduce it. Thus the capitalists earn wealth from the labor of their employees, not as a function of their personal contribution to the productive process, which may even be null, but as a function of the juridical relation of property to the means of production. Marxists argue that new wealth is created through labor applied to natural resources.<ref>Marx, Karl. Critique of the Gotha Programme, I. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ch01.htm</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
Marx argued that it was the goal of the proletariat to displace the capitalist system with the ], abolishing the social relationships underpinning the class system and then developing into a ] society in which "the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.".<ref>Marx, Karl. The Communist Manifesto, part II, Proletarians and Communists http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
==See also== |
