Misplaced Pages

Sui generis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:12, 10 September 2012 edit129.104.247.2 (talk) linked ad hoc← Previous edit Revision as of 21:04, 22 September 2012 edit undoCpiral (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,162 edits revert section blanking for now. Sections ''Political science'' and ''Sociology" restored. Discuss before blanking sections.Next edit →
Line 27: Line 27:
The United States, Japan, and many EU countries protect the topography of semiconductor chips and ] under ''sui generis'' laws, some of whose aspects are borrowed from patent or copyright law. The U.S. law known as the ] is codified at 17 U.S.C. §§ 901-915. The United States, Japan, and many EU countries protect the topography of semiconductor chips and ] under ''sui generis'' laws, some of whose aspects are borrowed from patent or copyright law. The U.S. law known as the ] is codified at 17 U.S.C. §§ 901-915.


== See also== ==Political science==
In ], the unparalleled development of the ] as compared to other ] has led to its designation as a ''sui generis'' ] entity. There has been widespread debate over the legal nature of the EU given its mixture of ] and ] elements, with the organisation thus possessing some characteristics common to ] and ] entities.
* ]

A similar case which has led to the use of the label ''sui generis'' is the unique relationship between France and ], since the legal status of New Caledonia can aptly be said to lie "somewhere between an ] and a ]". Whereas there are perhaps other examples of such a status for other ] or ], this arrangement is certainly unique within the French Republic.

The old ] may also fit under this category for its unique organization and place in ].

In local government, a ''sui generis'' entity is one which does not fit with the general scheme of local governance of a country. For example in England, the ] and the ] are the two ''sui generis'' localities, as their forms of local government are both very different from those of elsewhere in the country (for historical and geographical reasons).

Another example can be cited: the ] in ] was formed after international agreement, and has no similar example in the rest of the country.

The ] has been described as a ''sui generis'' entity possessing an international personality.

==Sociology==
In the ] of ], ''sui generis'' is used to illustrate his theory of social existence as follows. The main objective of sociology is to study social facts, each having a meaning of its own, yet only explainable by "other social facts". A social fact, if it is ''sui generis'', cannot be reduced to psychological or biological factors.
Durkheim stated when one takes an organization and replaces some individuals with some others, the essence of the organization does not (necessarily) change. It can happen, for example, that over the course of a few decades, the entire staff of an organization is replaced, while the organization retains its distinctive character. Now this thought is not limited to organization, but extends to the whole of society; a society ''per se'' has its own essence before any individual currently living in it is born, and is thus "independent of any individual". A ''sui generis'' society will continue its existence (the closest English meaning of ''sui generis'' in this sense being 'independent') after the apparently indispensable (or dispensable) or famous (or infamous) historical individual ceases to interact with it, but if society is purely ''sui generus'', the appearance of indispensability and deservedness is absolutely deceptive.


==References== ==References==

Revision as of 21:04, 22 September 2012

For the Argentine rock band, see Sui Generis. For other uses, see Sui generis (disambiguation).

Sui generis (/ˌsuːaɪ ˈdʒɛnərɪs/; Template:IPA-la) is a Latin expression, literally meaning "of its own kind/genus" or unique in its characteristics. The expression is often used in analytic philosophy to indicate an idea, an entity, or a reality which cannot be included in a wider concept.

Biology

In the taxonomical structure "genusSpecies= Genus + specific epithet.", a species is described as sui generis if its genus was created to classify it (i.e. its exceptional uniqueness at the time of classification necessitated the creation of a new genus, the sole member of which was initially the sui generis species). A species that is the lone extant member of its genus (e.g. the Homo genus) is not necessarily sui generis: extinction processes may have eliminated any number of species for which the genus was created.

Law

In law, it is a term of art used to identify a legal classification that exists independently of other categorizations because of its singularity or due to the specific creation of an entitlement or obligation. For example, a court's contempt powers arise sui generis and not from statute or rule. The New York Court of Appeals has used the term in describing cooperative apartment corporations, mostly because this form of housing is considered real property for some purposes and personal property for other purposes.

When referring to case citations and authorities, lawyers and judges may refer to an authority cited as being sui generis, meaning, in that context, it is one confined (or special) to its own facts, and therefore may not be of broader application. This is also the modern view courts are holding when deciding judgments based on oil and gas leases.

Statutory

In statutory interpretation, it refers to the problem of giving meaning to groups of words where one of the words is ambiguous or inherently unclear. For example, in criminal law, a statute might require a mens rea element of "unlawful and malicious" intent. Whereas the word "malicious" is well-understood, the word "unlawful" in this context is less clear. Hence, it must be given a meaning of the "same kind" as the word of established meaning.

This is particularly the case when the two or more words are conjoined, linked by the word "and", as opposed to placed in a disjunctive relationship, linked by the word "or". The interpretation of the two or more words might be different depending on the circumstances. Courts sometimes have to attribute a conjunctive (X 'and' Y) intention to the legislature even though the list is disjunctive (X 'or' Y) because, otherwise, no overall interpretation of the law in question would make sense.

Town planning

In British town planning law, many common types of land use are classified in "Use Classes". Change of use of land within a Use Class does not require planning permission; however, changing between certain Use Classes requires planning permission. Examples of sui generis use (identified in the Use Classes Order 1987) include embassies, theatres, amusement arcades, laundrettes, taxi or vehicle hire businesses, petrol filling stations, scrapyards, nightclubs, motor car showrooms, retail warehouses, clubs and hostels. The common misconception, even amongst qualified and experienced town planners, that the change of use from an existing use to one which is sui generis always requires planning permission is not correct. Although this is often the case, permission is only required if the sui generis use is materially different from the existing one. This will be a matter of fact and degree, and professional opinion.

Aboriginal law and education

The term has been used in the context of Canadian aboriginal law to describe the nature of aboriginal title, established by R. v. Guerin. Sui generis is also used in aboriginal education to describe the work of Aboriginal people to define and create contemporary aboriginal education as a "thing of its own kind". The motto "Sui Generis" has been adopted by the Akitsiraq Law School both in honour of the defining characteristic of aboriginal title in Canadian Law, and in acknowledgment of the unique form, admissions and curriculum of this one-of-a-kind professional legal education.

Intellectual property law

Generally speaking, protection for intellectual property is extended to matter depending upon its characteristics. The main types of intellectual property law -- copyrights, patents, and trademarks -- define characteristics, and any matter that meets such criteria is extended protection. However, statutes exist in many countries that extend IP-type protection to matter that does not meet traditional definitions of protected intellectual property, such as intellectual property rights in mask works, ship hull designs, fashion designs in France, databases, or plant varieties.

The United States, Japan, and many EU countries protect the topography of semiconductor chips and integrated circuits under sui generis laws, some of whose aspects are borrowed from patent or copyright law. The U.S. law known as the Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 is codified at 17 U.S.C. §§ 901-915.

Political science

In political science, the unparalleled development of the European Union as compared to other international organizations has led to its designation as a sui generis geopolitical entity. There has been widespread debate over the legal nature of the EU given its mixture of intergovernmental and supranational elements, with the organisation thus possessing some characteristics common to confederal and federal entities.

A similar case which has led to the use of the label sui generis is the unique relationship between France and New Caledonia, since the legal status of New Caledonia can aptly be said to lie "somewhere between an overseas collectivity and a sovereign nation". Whereas there are perhaps other examples of such a status for other disputed or dependent territories, this arrangement is certainly unique within the French Republic.

The old Holy Roman Empire may also fit under this category for its unique organization and place in European history.

In local government, a sui generis entity is one which does not fit with the general scheme of local governance of a country. For example in England, the City of London and the Isles of Scilly are the two sui generis localities, as their forms of local government are both very different from those of elsewhere in the country (for historical and geographical reasons).

Another example can be cited: the Joint Council of Municipalities in Croatia was formed after international agreement, and has no similar example in the rest of the country.

The legal status of the Holy See has been described as a sui generis entity possessing an international personality.

Sociology

In the sociology of Émile Durkheim, sui generis is used to illustrate his theory of social existence as follows. The main objective of sociology is to study social facts, each having a meaning of its own, yet only explainable by "other social facts". A social fact, if it is sui generis, cannot be reduced to psychological or biological factors. Durkheim stated when one takes an organization and replaces some individuals with some others, the essence of the organization does not (necessarily) change. It can happen, for example, that over the course of a few decades, the entire staff of an organization is replaced, while the organization retains its distinctive character. Now this thought is not limited to organization, but extends to the whole of society; a society per se has its own essence before any individual currently living in it is born, and is thus "independent of any individual". A sui generis society will continue its existence (the closest English meaning of sui generis in this sense being 'independent') after the apparently indispensable (or dispensable) or famous (or infamous) historical individual ceases to interact with it, but if society is purely sui generus, the appearance of indispensability and deservedness is absolutely deceptive.

References

  1. "sui generis". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  2. Dictionary.com "Word of the day" 2001-06-14 accessed 2007-10-14
  3. See Dunway v. New York,442 U.S. 200 (1979).
  4. See In re Marriage of Betts, 558 N.E.2d 404, 200 Ill.App.3d 26 (1990).
  5. See Matter of State Tax Commn. v. Shor, 43 NY2d 151, 400 N.Y.S.2d 805, 371 N.E.2d 523 (1977).
  6. (Hampton, E. (p. 10-11) in Battiste & Barman (Eds.). First Nations Education in Canada: The Circle Unfolds. UBC Press, 1995)
Law
Core subjects
Disciplines
Sources of law
Law making
Legal systems
Legal theory
Jurisprudence
Legal institutions
History
Categories: