| Revision as of 03:13, 19 September 2012 editThe Blade of the Northern Lights (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators55,825 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:11, 19 September 2012 edit undoAslbsl (talk | contribs)450 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| == September 2012 == | == September 2012 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been temporarily ''']''' from editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. ] (]) 03:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been temporarily ''']''' from editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. ] (]) 03:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | ||
| {{unblock|reason=I made no 1rr violation - Nableezy was misrepresenting the diffs. There was no , as he claims; I did not undo his edit (I did not remove EJ as he says, rather I moved it one sentence and it is still there even now!). Only (The other edits he includes from weeks ago, not the subject of this report, are also misrepresented as far as date and content). ] (]) 10:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 10:11, 19 September 2012
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Sinan Reis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Sinan Reis
Hello! Your submission of Sinan Reis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady (talk) 19:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Sinan Reis
 | On 23 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sinan Reis, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Sinan Reis, a Sephardi Jewish pirate and Barbary corsair whose family was expelled from Spain in 1492, helped Ottoman admiral Hayreddin Barbarossa defeat the Spanish at the 1538 Battle of Preveza (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sinan Reis.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Garden of the King, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greenspace and Kingdom of Israel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Expert-subject
FYI, see these threads. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 16:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Palestinian Civil Police Force
Hello! Your submission of Palestinian Civil Police Force at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lihaas (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- could you respond to the comments made on March 11th? I would like to proceed with the review of this article, but the issues need to be addressed.--Ishtar456 (talk) 22:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/Palestinian Civil Police Force
hi, I put a request on the DYK talk page for Template:Did you know nominations/Palestinian Civil Police Force to be restored to the nomination page. --Ishtar456 (talk) 19:36, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
1RR
You have, once again, violated the 1RR at Gilo. I will be reporting that violation if you do not self-revert. You are not entitled to force your changes in to articles without consensus, and such behavior can lead to blocks or bans. Please self-revert and seek consensus for your edits. nableezy - 15:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- As you have refused to self-revert, I have brought the issue to the arbitration enforcement board. You can see this here. nableezy - 18:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
Aslbsl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made no 1rr violation - Nableezy was misrepresenting the diffs. There was no initial revert, as he claims; I did not undo his edit (I did not remove EJ as he says, rather I moved it one sentence and it is still there even now!). Only one revert (The other edits he includes from weeks ago, not the subject of this report, are also misrepresented as far as date and content). Aslbsl (talk) 10:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I made no 1rr violation - Nableezy was misrepresenting the diffs. There was no , as he claims; I did not undo his edit (I did not remove EJ as he says, rather I moved it one sentence and it is still there even now!). Only (The other edits he includes from weeks ago, not the subject of this report, are also misrepresented as far as date and content). ] (]) 10:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I made no 1rr violation - Nableezy was misrepresenting the diffs. There was no , as he claims; I did not undo his edit (I did not remove EJ as he says, rather I moved it one sentence and it is still there even now!). Only (The other edits he includes from weeks ago, not the subject of this report, are also misrepresented as far as date and content). ] (]) 10:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I made no 1rr violation - Nableezy was misrepresenting the diffs. There was no , as he claims; I did not undo his edit (I did not remove EJ as he says, rather I moved it one sentence and it is still there even now!). Only (The other edits he includes from weeks ago, not the subject of this report, are also misrepresented as far as date and content). ] (]) 10:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}