Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Demons (Sleigh Bells song): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:31, 26 September 2012 editFezmar9 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,104 edits sigh...← Previous edit Revision as of 18:23, 26 September 2012 edit undoErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,272 edits commentNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
*Seriously, what is your problem? Are you ''still'' ]? ] didn't work, the ] didn't work, ] didn't work, so now you're coming to AfD? All this is making ''yourself'' look bad, you know. (And at the very least, the article could be merged to ].) '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 06:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC) *Seriously, what is your problem? Are you ''still'' ]? ] didn't work, the ] didn't work, ] didn't work, so now you're coming to AfD? All this is making ''yourself'' look bad, you know. (And at the very least, the article could be merged to ].) '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 06:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
**Our other dispute is regarding the definition of a single. This AFD is based purely on notability and warranting an independent article. These are two entirely different things. Please either contribute constructive, relevent comments to this discussion, or don't comment at all. ] (]) 06:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC) **Our other dispute is regarding the definition of a single. This AFD is based purely on notability and warranting an independent article. These are two entirely different things. Please either contribute constructive, relevent comments to this discussion, or don't comment at all. ] (]) 06:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
***Two entirely different things? Really? You say that after and ? And to anyone else monitoring this, proof of forum shopping began and , and then spilled into , and . This is thus a ] nomination. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 18:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ]. There's fairly wide coverage of this single (, , , , , , , , ) but nothing that has enough to really justify a standalone article. --] (]) 06:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC) *'''Merge''' to ]. There's fairly wide coverage of this single (, , , , , , , , ) but nothing that has enough to really justify a standalone article. --] (]) 06:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:23, 26 September 2012

Demons (Sleigh Bells song)

Demons (Sleigh Bells song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG criteria, specifically: "a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." After conducting my own research, the majority of the articles out there merely mention a music video exists, or the song gets mentioned in a review. There's not much information specifically pertaining to this song that one could plausibly expand the article very much beyond what it is now. Fezmar9 (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Categories: