Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bongwarrior: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:51, 29 September 2012 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,223 edits →Seriously?: rp← Previous edit Revision as of 23:54, 29 September 2012 edit undoRyan Vesey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,107 edits →Seriously?: cmtNext edit →
Line 93: Line 93:
::::::::That's how it usually goes, isn't it? --] (]) 23:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC) ::::::::That's how it usually goes, isn't it? --] (]) 23:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
::::::::: Unfortunately, yes. Sorry, it was clearly excessive given the situation. ] (]) 23:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC) ::::::::: Unfortunately, yes. Sorry, it was clearly excessive given the situation. ] (]) 23:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
*If we wanted to make policy such that any form of abusive language was a qualification for a block, I'd be supportive. Outside of that, we need to base the blocks on the situation. In this case, the block was not appropriate for the situation. ] ] 23:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:54, 29 September 2012

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Unsigned messages will likely be removed. For messages left here, I will usually respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I will watch for a response there.
 Start a new talk topic.


Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (April 2007 – October 2007)
Archive 2 (October 2007 – January 2008)
Archive 3 (January 2008 – April 2008)
Archive 4 (April 2008 – September 2008)
Archive 5 (September 2008 – April 2009)
Archive 6 (April 2009 – January 2010)
Archive 7 (January 2010 – October 2010)
Archive 8 (October 2010 – May 2011)
Archive 9 (May 2011 – October 2011)
Archive 10 (October 2011 – May 2012)
Archive 11 (May 2012 – present)

Another IP

You seem to be on. Special:Contributions/175.176.219.170 ⁓ Hello71 22:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:33, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Talk page message

What are you talking about? I didnt touch any page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.173.172.52 (talk) 05:51, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the confusion. The messages on your talk page weren't meant for you - they were intended for someone who had edited from your IP address years ago. You are welcome to remove the messages if you'd like. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

For blocking 173.18.169.203, it was getting annoying reverting his edits so much! daintalk   01:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you...

... for clearing that nastiness from my Talk page. Enjoy a brownie. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 04:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

A pie...

...For having to put up with a lot of immature people impersonating you and vandalising your page. Have this hot pie to throw at them next time, it will burn! ツ Jenova20 10:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Seriously?

You've blocked someone for a week for that edit summary? Black Kite (talk) 23:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

It's hardly an isolated incident. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:34, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
So you haven't blocked them for that edit summary, but for something else? Black Kite (talk) 23:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
His block log for civility is the one of the longest I've ever seen. I don't think Bongwarrior was unjustified in making that block.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
You do not block on the basis of a block log. You block on the basis of the existing incident. Would another editor have been blocked for a week for that? Black Kite (talk) 23:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Beyond unjustified. Malleus was clearly provoked. Ryan Vesey 23:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Indeed. Please undo this block. Black Kite (talk) 23:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Not happening, at least not by me. Malleus has seemingly made a career out of this sort of behavior. A one week block is lenient, if anything. Enough is enough. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict)I will not attempt to speak for Bongwarrior here, but a long-term pattern of incivility easily leads to a block though I think 48 hours is better. If this were a first offense, probably no block.
On the subject of provocation, yes Malleus was provoked. However, I feel that it's not proper to blame others for Malleus' incivility, because he shouldn't be getting a free pass for repeated incivility incidents. I am not comfortable having this discussion on-wiki, because I have respect for Malleus. But I still side with Bongwarrior's decision here.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Fine. I'll undo it myself, then. Black Kite (talk) 23:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
That's how it usually goes, isn't it? --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, yes. Sorry, it was clearly excessive given the situation. Black Kite (talk) 23:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
  • If we wanted to make policy such that any form of abusive language was a qualification for a block, I'd be supportive. Outside of that, we need to base the blocks on the situation. In this case, the block was not appropriate for the situation. Ryan Vesey 23:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)