| Revision as of 21:24, 2 October 2012 editKaz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,175 edits stalker issues again *sigh*← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:46, 2 October 2012 edit undoFloquenbeam (talk | contribs)Administrators38,365 edits →Indefinitely blocked: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Due to prejudiced harassment, this page is regularly blanked in order to protect privacy. If you want a response from this user, please use the ] | Due to prejudiced harassment, this page is regularly blanked in order to protect privacy. If you want a response from this user, please use the ] | ||
| == Indefinitely blocked == | |||
| This is not an "infinite" block, but you are going to have to convince an admin you are going to stop being disruptive before being unblocked. Beeblebrox gave very clear warning to stop refactoring other people's edits on the article talk page, yet you have done so twice. There is a contentious requested move that you are deeply involved in, but today you decided to not wait for it to close, moved the page yourself, and sabotaged the ability of other editors to revert your move. Enough disruption. The standard template is below. --] (]) 21:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | |||
Revision as of 21:46, 2 October 2012
Due to prejudiced harassment, this page is regularly blanked in order to protect privacy. If you want a response from this user, please use the email
Indefinitely blocked
This is not an "infinite" block, but you are going to have to convince an admin you are going to stop being disruptive before being unblocked. Beeblebrox gave very clear warning to stop refactoring other people's edits on the article talk page, yet you have done so twice. There is a contentious requested move that you are deeply involved in, but today you decided to not wait for it to close, moved the page yourself, and sabotaged the ability of other editors to revert your move. Enough disruption. The standard template is below. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.