Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:18, 2 November 2012

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted on 17 September 2012 by reviewer Joel Kirk (talk · contribs). Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Computing High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Women's History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Women scientists High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some questions

I came to this article to help address the neutrality concerns that another editor flagged. I don't see any description of the perceived POV issues here, and left a note on the page of the editor who added that tag asking whether they could explain their concerns. I did notice a different problem, though, which is that the references are not very complete. There are only a few inline citations, and of those, only one of them (the profile in Inc. Magazine) is independent of the subject. The others are from Ping Fu's autobiography and her company's website. However, there are lots of other sources listed as references at the bottom of the page. Maybe we could convert those into inline citations? Keihatsu (talk) 06:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

You are right and some of them probably were cites, since one lists a page number. Happy editing. --  :- ) Don 14:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

I'll take a look at converting those sources into in-line references. In the mean time, the editor who flagged the page as having neutrality problems has still not responded, so I think I am going to remove that tag, as I don't see any major issues myself. Another question I have is about the ranking of this page as a "Good Article." I've read a bit about the evaluation criteria, and I'm not sure this one makes the grade. Do you have any thoughts?Keihatsu (talk) 19:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• C-Class AfC articles
• AfC submissions by date/September 2012
• Accepted AfC submissions
• C-Class biography articles
• WikiProject Biography articles
• Unassessed Computing articles
• High-importance Computing articles
• All Computing articles
• C-Class Women's History articles
• High-importance Women's History articles
• All WikiProject Women-related pages
• WikiProject Women's History articles
• C-Class Women scientists articles
• High-importance Women scientists articles
• WikiProject Women scientists articles