| Revision as of 12:58, 8 November 2012 editYuMaNuMa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,948 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:07, 8 November 2012 edit undoTagremover (talk | contribs)4,797 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Disregard what I said before, continue to review it if you wish. '']]'' <sup>] </sup> 12:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | Disregard what I said before, continue to review it if you wish. '']]'' <sup>] </sup> 12:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Deleted content: Supported to wait for any good article nomination until the issues are solved. The reviews section is the WORST i've ever seen! Unscientific, with nonsense citations, defended by a few users - including YuMaNuMa - with many users sees it as biased, see talk! ] (]) 13:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:07, 8 November 2012
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Obtund (talk · contribs) 09:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Disregard what I said before, continue to review it if you wish. YuMaNuMa 12:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted content: Supported to wait for any good article nomination until the issues are solved. The reviews section is the WORST i've ever seen! Unscientific, with nonsense citations, defended by a few users - including YuMaNuMa - with many users sees it as biased, see talk! Tagremover (talk) 13:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)