| Revision as of 07:20, 9 May 2006 editTobyink (talk | contribs)135 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:28, 4 August 2006 edit undoStorkk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,517 editsm quick brown fox questionNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Mention that Garamond was Apple's main font used in publicity during the 80s and 90s? ] 07:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC) | Mention that Garamond was Apple's main font used in publicity during the 80s and 90s? ] 07:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ---- | |||
| "The Quick brown fox" sentence looks remarkably like the letters below. What face is it in, if it's not garamond? Can't it be removed from the picture? If someone confirms it's not Garamond, I'll chop it off myself --] 21:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:28, 4 August 2006
I have taken out:
The text below is presumably referring to some specific typeface called "Garamond", but which one? It's not clear that describing (any version of) Garamond by relating it to Times Roman is a particularly great plan, anyway...
Garamond is the inspiration for most modern typefaces with serifs, notably Times Roman. The strokes are somewhat thinner and more sculpted than Times Roman. The ends of strokes end in tapering calligraphic triangles reminiscent of brush strokes. The designer coordinated the angles of the strokes, sizes and ornaments of the serifs and radii of the flourishes across many sizes to achieve a stylistically unified typeface that has the same feel, while remaining readable at all sizes. The clearest evidence of unified angles is in the capital W and M, classically the largest and hardest glyphs to design.
This is a general discussion about serif fonts, which belongs on the serif page, and I'm currently working on a classification there. Will take this back in eventually. -- djmutex 2003-04-30
While you point to the confusion between Jannon's and Garamond's faces, you have put Monotype Garamond in the infobox. This is based Jannon's work and is more of a transitional font, whereas Garamond's is old style. Would it not be more accurate to have a font based on actual work from Garamond there, like Stempel or Adobe Garamond? ~AR
Mention that Garamond was Apple's main font used in publicity during the 80s and 90s? Tobyink 07:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
"The Quick brown fox" sentence looks remarkably like the letters below. What face is it in, if it's not garamond? Can't it be removed from the picture? If someone confirms it's not Garamond, I'll chop it off myself --Storkk 21:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)