Revision as of 16:37, 14 November 2012 view sourceAlexandrDmitri (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,569 edits →Resysoping of FCYTravis/Polarscribe: declined← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:50, 17 November 2012 view source Wikiwind (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers1,933 edits addNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | ||
== Youreallycan == | |||
'''Initiated by ''' ''<font face="bold">]]</font> '''at''' 13:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== Involved parties === | |||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | |||
*{{userlinks|Wikiwind}}, ''filing party'' | |||
*{{userlinks|Youreallycan}} | |||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | |||
*Diff. 1 | |||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
;Declined arbitration requests: | |||
* | |||
* (Withdrawn) | |||
=== Statement by Wikiwind === | |||
I think it is high time for Arbitration Committee to examine conduct of ]. His conduct has been discussed by the community in RFC/U and in dozens of AN and AN/I threads, but it usually ends up as stalemate or "no consensus for anything". I am aware of the recently declined request, but the problems with this user will not go away. The pattern is always the same: after AN/I discussion he usually promises to improve his conduct and not to repeat the behavior that brought him into trouble, but that does not last long and after 10-15 days he is back to his old ways. | |||
His aggressive comments, personal attacks and attempts to discredit people's views based on personal traits often (if not always) have a clear intention to cause disruption on various noticeboards. The latest examples are his comments (now removed by user Kim Dent-Brown) on AN/I () where he tried to discredit several users by accusing them of having "massive homosexual edit focus". Some of the "accused" users (like ]) don't edit homosexuality and LGBT-related articles at all (at least not to a large extent). | |||
I urge Arbitration Committee to take this case, because I think the issue will keep popping up. Thanks.--''<font face="bold">]]</font> 14:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by {Party 2} === | |||
=== Statement by {Party 3} === | |||
=== Clerk notes === | |||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' | |||
=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0) === | |||
<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)</small> | |||
* |
Revision as of 14:50, 17 November 2012
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Youreallycan | 17 November 2012 | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 10 January 2025 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Youreallycan
Initiated by В и к и T at 13:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Wikiwind (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Youreallycan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Diff. 1
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Youreallycan
- Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive773#Repeated_violation_of_RfC_restrictions_-_site_ban_proposed_for_Youreallycan
- Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive761#Continual_harassment_by_Youreallycan
- Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive730#User:Off2riorob_.2F_User:Youreallycan
- Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive232#Topic_ban_proposal_for_User:Youreallycan_.28ex_Off2riorob.29
- Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive744#Unacceptable_homophobic_attacks_by_Youreallycan.2FOff2riorob
- Declined arbitration requests
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=521269431#Youreallycan
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=507602026#Youreallycan (Withdrawn)
Statement by Wikiwind
I think it is high time for Arbitration Committee to examine conduct of User:Youreallycan. His conduct has been discussed by the community in RFC/U and in dozens of AN and AN/I threads, but it usually ends up as stalemate or "no consensus for anything". I am aware of the recently declined request, but the problems with this user will not go away. The pattern is always the same: after AN/I discussion he usually promises to improve his conduct and not to repeat the behavior that brought him into trouble, but that does not last long and after 10-15 days he is back to his old ways.
His aggressive comments, personal attacks and attempts to discredit people's views based on personal traits often (if not always) have a clear intention to cause disruption on various noticeboards. The latest examples are his comments (now removed by user Kim Dent-Brown) on AN/I () where he tried to discredit several users by accusing them of having "massive homosexual edit focus". Some of the "accused" users (like User:Binksternet) don't edit homosexuality and LGBT-related articles at all (at least not to a large extent).
I urge Arbitration Committee to take this case, because I think the issue will keep popping up. Thanks.--В и к и T 14:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Statement by {Party 2}
Statement by {Party 3}
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0)
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)