| Revision as of 21:53, 18 November 2012 edit5 albert square (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,587 edits You have been blocked from editing. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:15, 18 November 2012 edit undoAlohamesamis (talk | contribs)140 edits →November 2012Next edit → | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
| == November 2012 == | == November 2012 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for personal attacks aimed directly at editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for personal attacks aimed directly at editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | ||
| {{unblock|reason=I was attacked ] by ]. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? ] (]) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 22:15, 18 November 2012
Welcome
|
October 2012
Your recent editing history at Francis Bacon (artist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- You're a very new account. Two editors have reverted you; yet you persist. Adding many, many refs (in the wrong way, btw) doesn't necessarily resolve the issue. Discuss the content on the talk page, or you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Alohamesamis, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Alohamesamis! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please join other people who edit Misplaced Pages at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC) |
November 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Alohamesamis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was attacked ] by User:Jon C.. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? Alohamesamis (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was attacked ] by ]. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? ] (]) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was attacked ] by ]. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? ] (]) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was attacked ] by ]. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? ] (]) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}