Revision as of 22:15, 18 November 2012 editAlohamesamis (talk | contribs)140 edits →November 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:54, 18 November 2012 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,461 edits →November 2012Next edit → | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for personal attacks aimed directly at editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for personal attacks aimed directly at editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | ||
{{unblock|reason=I was attacked ] by ]. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? ] (]) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|reason=I was attacked ] by ]. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? ] (]) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)|decline=If you can't tell the difference between "get bent" and "you cunt", you're not going to last long around here. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 22:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 22:54, 18 November 2012
Welcome
|
October 2012
Your recent editing history at Francis Bacon (artist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- You're a very new account. Two editors have reverted you; yet you persist. Adding many, many refs (in the wrong way, btw) doesn't necessarily resolve the issue. Discuss the content on the talk page, or you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Alohamesamis, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Alohamesamis! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please join other people who edit Misplaced Pages at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC) |
November 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for personal attacks aimed directly at editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Alohamesamis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was attacked ] by User:Jon C.. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? Alohamesamis (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you can't tell the difference between "get bent" and "you cunt", you're not going to last long around here. --jpgordon 22:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.