| Revision as of 02:39, 7 December 2012 editAnybob (talk | contribs)140 edits Explanation of my view on this user's changes to Hiram College entry | Revision as of 15:08, 7 December 2012 edit undo76.189.107.195 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Over the past few days you've made a significant number of substantial edits to ]'s entry that removed a large amount of information that had been in place for a while. Some of the minor edits involving citations and proper grammar are certainly useful and add to the clarity of the article's content, but others seem to have been hastily enacted with a bevy of reasons that don't appear to fully justify the changes, such as your accusation that some of the article's content was in violation of POV standards. I'm recommending that a more discerning approach be taken with further edits and that some of the previous content be restored to the entry to give it back the well-composed and legitimate information it previously contained. Some of your more sizable edits have, in my opinion, given the article a lop-sided appearance in terms of layout and siphoned away some of its necessary content. In order to avoid an ] I've contacted you in the interest of bringing attention to my likely changes and possible restorations. say anybob 02:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC) (]) | Over the past few days you've made a significant number of substantial edits to ]'s entry that removed a large amount of information that had been in place for a while. Some of the minor edits involving citations and proper grammar are certainly useful and add to the clarity of the article's content, but others seem to have been hastily enacted with a bevy of reasons that don't appear to fully justify the changes, such as your accusation that some of the article's content was in violation of POV standards. I'm recommending that a more discerning approach be taken with further edits and that some of the previous content be restored to the entry to give it back the well-composed and legitimate information it previously contained. Some of your more sizable edits have, in my opinion, given the article a lop-sided appearance in terms of layout and siphoned away some of its necessary content. In order to avoid an ] I've contacted you in the interest of bringing attention to my likely changes and possible restorations. say anybob 02:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC) (]) | ||
| :I'd be happy to discuss it on the article's talk page. Thanks. --] (]) 15:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:08, 7 December 2012
Regarding Recent Influx of Edits on Hiram College entry
Over the past few days you've made a significant number of substantial edits to Hiram College's entry that removed a large amount of information that had been in place for a while. Some of the minor edits involving citations and proper grammar are certainly useful and add to the clarity of the article's content, but others seem to have been hastily enacted with a bevy of reasons that don't appear to fully justify the changes, such as your accusation that some of the article's content was in violation of POV standards. I'm recommending that a more discerning approach be taken with further edits and that some of the previous content be restored to the entry to give it back the well-composed and legitimate information it previously contained. Some of your more sizable edits have, in my opinion, given the article a lop-sided appearance in terms of layout and siphoned away some of its necessary content. In order to avoid an edit war I've contacted you in the interest of bringing attention to my likely changes and possible restorations. say anybob 02:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC) (talk)
- I'd be happy to discuss it on the article's talk page. Thanks. --76.189.107.195 (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC)