User talk:Tariqmia: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:30, 14 January 2013 editAddbot (talk \| contribs)Bots2,838,809 editsm Bot: Substing template Template:Welcome← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:21, 14 January 2013 edit undoSalvio giuliano (talk \| contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators49,151 edits You have been blocked from editing. (TW)Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	{{Ivmbox \| image = yes \| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} --> \| valign = center \| ] }} ] (]) 21:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)		{{Ivmbox \| image = yes \| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} --> \| valign = center \| ] }} ] (]) 21:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

			<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''a week''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx\|" code. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.  <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> ''']'''</span> ] 14:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

Revision as of 14:21, 14 January 2013

Welcome!

Hello, Tariqmia, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! :) --Freemesm (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Freemesm, Thanks for the information. I am new but I am only a month behind you Tariqmia (talk) 07:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Your addition to Islamic Development Bank has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Misplaced Pages. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Darkness Shines, The annual report is not copyrighted as the information is released to the public domain by the Islamic Development Bank for the viewing of the general public. The WP:PD states that the public domain material is material “that were released into the public domain by the copyright holder”. On that basis, I believe that information can be included on the Misplaced Pages article. As a newcomer, I’d say the following are relevant: Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers and WP:AGF. It will help to have a constructive discussion instead of the deletion, as information needs to be added to the Islamic Development Bank wikipage.

I will reverse your deletions and include the above discussion at the IDB talk page

I would strongly advise against reverting copyrighted content into Misplaced Pages. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Darkness Shines, Please state why you think it is copyrighted. As a newcomer, I have the right to know. Misplaced Pages:Civility states "Explain yourself". Tariqmia (talk) 21:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Lol, a new editor already spouting policy. See the article talk page. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Darkness Shines (talk) 21:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for meatpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio 14:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:30, 14 January 2013 editAddbot (talk \| contribs)Bots2,838,809 editsm Bot: Substing template Template:Welcome← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:21, 14 January 2013 edit undoSalvio giuliano (talk \| contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators49,151 edits You have been blocked from editing. (TW)Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	{{Ivmbox \| image = yes \| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} --> \| valign = center \| ] }} ] (]) 21:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)		{{Ivmbox \| image = yes \| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} --> \| valign = center \| ] }} ] (]) 21:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

			<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''a week''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx\|" code. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.  <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> ''']'''</span> ] 14:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->