Hardin v. Boyd: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 14:11, 4 February 2013 editJesse V. (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,277 editsm tags and general fixes, removed underlinked tag, added deadend tag using AWB (8853)← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:39, 5 February 2013 edit undoAndrewman327 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,253 editsm clearing backlog of dead end pages using AWB (8853)Next edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:
	}}		}}

	'''''Hardin v. Boyd''''', {{scite\|113\|756\|1885}}, was a motion to dismiss a ~~suit~~ on county bonds issued in aid of a railroad. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The defendant brought a writ bf error to reverse it. Subsequently to the judgment, the county settled with the plaintiff and other bondholders, by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error<ref> ''Justia.com''</ref>		'''''Hardin v. Boyd''''', {{scite\|113\|756\|1885}}, was a motion to dismiss a ] on county bonds issued in aid of a railroad. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The defendant brought a writ bf error to reverse it. Subsequently to the judgment, the county settled with the plaintiff and other bondholders, by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error<ref> ''Justia.com''</ref>

	The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed.		The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed.

Revision as of 19:39, 5 February 2013

This article has no links to other Misplaced Pages articles. Please help improve this article by adding links that are relevant to the context within the existing text. (February 2013)

1885 United States Supreme Court case

Hardin v. Boyd
Supreme Court of the United States
Submitted December 22, 1884 Decided March 15, 1885
Full case name	Hardin, Administratrix, & Others v. Boyd, Administrator, & Others
Citations	113 U.S. 756 (more)
Court membership
Chief Justice Morrison Waite Associate Justices Samuel F. Miller · Stephen J. Field Joseph P. Bradley · John M. Harlan William B. Woods · Stanley Matthews Horace Gray · Samuel Blatchford

Hardin v. Boyd, 113 U.S. 756 (1885), was a motion to dismiss a lawsuit on county bonds issued in aid of a railroad. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The defendant brought a writ bf error to reverse it. Subsequently to the judgment, the county settled with the plaintiff and other bondholders, by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error

The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed.

References

Hardin v. Boyd, 113 U.S. 756 (1885) Justia.com

External links

Justia.com, 113 U.S. 756, full text of the case

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: