Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ping Fu: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:54, 8 February 2013 editCinteotl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,603 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 06:06, 8 February 2013 edit undoCinteotl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,603 edits Removed WP:PA personal attacksNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
{{WikiProject Women scientists |class=C |importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Women scientists |class=C |importance=mid}}
}} }}

She entered US on 1984 Jan, She become US citizen 1992.
She should have green card since 1987(5 years before 1992). She married 1991(to US citizen)。
1987 green card can NOT via marriage. How comes she get green card in such short time only 3 years?
If she had F1 student visa enter US on 1984, 3 years later 1987 got green card, this can't be a F1 to H1b to Green card. 3 years she might not even finish her B.S degree, she said she do B.S degree first.

To best of my knowledge, through asylum is most likely she did.
In order to get her asylum status approved, she was very likely to make stories such as rape, jail, children worker, expel, etc to immigration asylum office on 1987!!!!

All her story about abuse, rape, in prison, children workers, deport, are very likely fake if she can't provide solid evidence.
The only reason she make those very likely fake statement to immigration is to get asylum green card!!!

This would be serious violate the Federal immigration Law!!!!
This is serious CRIME!!!!
Even it was 1987!!!!

Ping Fu was awarded last year by USCIS the “Outstanding American by Choice”.

USCIS based on her story like jail, rape, children worker etc like media said. Those fake stories were very likely used on 1987 when she apply for asylum green card(1992 citizenship).

If her stories are fake, she submit fake stories to immigration service to get asylum green card. This should be regards a serious CRIME!!! violating Federal Immigration Law.

USCIS immigration service gave her honor outstanding american????
Honor her making fake document to get asylum green card???????
Honor her use fake stories to treat the media, treating the whole world????

Wake up US immigration service, USCIS should start investigation on her immigration document she submitted on 1987 green card.

If her 1987 immigration document has same stories as now days media says,
Then USCIS should easily find out wether those statement are true or not.

If she tell the truth she don’t have to remember anything. A liar needs a good memory.

On ping fu's new article (huffington post), "Clarifying the Facts in Bend, Not Break",
she claim that "I didn't apply for political asylum; I was explicitly told not to attract attention."

Reuters's TV interview, 06:47, when Editor-at-Large Sir Harold Evans said to Ping "..you are basically refugee...", ping agree with this comment by not objecting it.
Why Reuter's editor think Ping Fu is a refugee? Did reuter's editor looked up Ping's immigration history already knows she was refugee status(asylum green card)?
Or Ping told editor that she was refugee ( political asylum)?

If ping was refugee, then her statement on huffington post (not apply for political asylum) was fake!
If ping was not refugee, then she lie to Reuter's editor, that she was.

a liar need a good memory, apparently Ping Fu do NOT have a good memory.

If ping did not apply asylum green card, how she get green card so quick from F1 student visa in 3 years? (1984 – 1987)

USCIS immigration service, don't be blind, need start investigation on whether Ping Fu get green card through asylum/refugee program.

USCIS honor Ping Fu “outstanding of american by choice ” last year, if Ping fu did not submit her fake stories to immigration service,
USCIS's honor was based on what source?

USCIS, wake up, looked up Ping FU's immigration history,
IF ping's green card and honor was based on her fake stories.
This is a serious CRIME by violating Federal Immigration Law!!!!!! Her case need re-open for further investigation.

To answer the question at the top about her immigration visa, there was probably a previous marriage sometime between 1986 and 1988 through which she obtained the green card. It is not clear why some Asian newspapers said that she seeked political asylum. She had denied that herself. — Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Is she a phony? ==
How on earth could she be 'the dirt under others' shoes' and get no education' yet get into any Chinese university? As someone who lives in Asia, I find this truly imaginary. ] (]) 05:55, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

I watched in an interview of her on BBC HardTalk yesterday and she said she was gangraped by 10 men (red army soldiers) and she did speak excellent English! I wonder if it is a case of using the Cultural Revolution as a false alibi for atrocities committed, the beauty being if there is any current refutation of those events then one can always say the regime is lying about human rights violations as it always does! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== NPOV label added == == NPOV label added ==
Line 85: Line 23:
== Great woman == == Great woman ==
She said she studied in Suzhou University in 1977,but Suzhou University was only established in 1982....lol](]) 11:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC) She said she studied in Suzhou University in 1977,but Suzhou University was only established in 1982....lol](]) 11:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

== The following statement on the controversy is misleading ==

"Controversy erupted when a Forbes article about it used the term "labor camp". Some claimed the story was fabricated and others fiercely denied that was the case. Forbes later issued a correction."

It goes way beyond the choice of word. That is why the correction from Forbes did not stop the discussion.(http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2013/01/31/bend-not-break-author-ping-fu-responds-to-backlash/). There should be more accurate summary of the debate. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Amazon Attack== ==Amazon Attack==
Ping Fu is currently subject to an attack, at . Daily Beast characterizes it as an "online Chinese attack," saying that it "bears elements of the type of Internet bullying—known by the ominous phrase “human flesh search”—that is increasingly common among Chinese bloggers." <ref>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/04/ping-fu-defends-bend-not-break-memoir-against-online-chinese-attack.html<ref> Ping Fu is currently subject to an attack, at . Daily Beast characterizes it as an "online Chinese attack," saying that it "bears elements of the type of Internet bullying—known by the ominous phrase “human flesh search”—that is increasingly common among Chinese bloggers." <ref>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/04/ping-fu-defends-bend-not-break-memoir-against-online-chinese-attack.html</ref>


In the last few days, there have been a number of anonymous edits to this article that appear to be related to the Amazon attack. ] (]) 05:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC) In the last few days, there have been a number of anonymous edits to this article that appear to be related to the Amazon attack. ] (]) 05:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:06, 8 February 2013

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconArticles for creation
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Note icon
This article was accepted on 17 September 2012 by reviewer Joel Kirk (talk · contribs).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconChina High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconComputing High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWomen's History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWomen scientists Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV label added

1. Almost all the citations of Ping Fu's early personal biography were referred to her autobiography (was inserted by her coauthor Meimei Fox) and her company's website. From a neutral point of view, it just doesn't look right.

2. Some descriptions in the personal biography might not be true and need more citations. For example:

a. "The government briefly detained Ping Fu, and then exiled her to the United States." This is not the normal way of the Chinese government dealing with discents in early 1980s. They normally would be thrown into prison for quite a long time. The government started to exile ONLY those very famous ones from 1990s, and Ping Fu is definitely not one of them. During that time, everyone want to go to USA, and CCP was not that silly.

b."Ping arrived in America in 1983 at age 25 on a student visa " As it is mentioned in the last paragraph, she was exiled. This is not consistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloudsorest (talkcontribs) 23:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

new information on Ping Fu from Forbes

Please refer to http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2013/01/31/bend-not-break-author-ping-fu-responds-to-backlash/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloudsorest (talkcontribs) 21:25, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Great woman

She said she studied in Suzhou University in 1977,but Suzhou University was only established in 1982....lolKsyrie(Talkie talkie) 11:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Amazon Attack

Ping Fu is currently subject to an attack, at . Daily Beast characterizes it as an "online Chinese attack," saying that it "bears elements of the type of Internet bullying—known by the ominous phrase “human flesh search”—that is increasingly common among Chinese bloggers."

In the last few days, there have been a number of anonymous edits to this article that appear to be related to the Amazon attack. Fearofreprisal (talk) 05:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

  1. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/04/ping-fu-defends-bend-not-break-memoir-against-online-chinese-attack.html
Categories: