| Revision as of 23:58, 13 February 2013 editJoe Decker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users95,431 edits →Heterophobia: add DRV links← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:01, 14 February 2013 edit undoTarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits →Heterophobia: - endorse and get rid of this joker.Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| This page faced persecution of multiple types. First all the references were removed, then people complained that there were no references then it was deleted. Also, the deletion of this page shows the extreme bias on wikipedia and the fact that both sides of the coin isn't shown. ] (]) 23:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC) | This page faced persecution of multiple types. First all the references were removed, then people complained that there were no references then it was deleted. Also, the deletion of this page shows the extreme bias on wikipedia and the fact that both sides of the coin isn't shown. ] (]) 23:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| : '''As closer''' Happy to have this reviewed. Please note that the nominator has not attempted to discuss the matter with me prior to listing (step 1), but did notify me of the DRV. It's my view that this was a completely transparent case of SNOW. --]] 23:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC) | : '''As closer''' Happy to have this reviewed. Please note that the nominator has not attempted to discuss the matter with me prior to listing (step 1), but did notify me of the DRV. It's my view that this was a completely transparent case of SNOW. --]] 23:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Endorse''' - Please let's not waste time at DRV reviewing the homophobic antics of a disruptive user. AN encyclopedia is not a platform to promote one's fringe, anti-gay points of view; we all know that, that's why this trashy article was swiftly deleted. ] (]) 00:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ====] (closed)==== | ====] (closed)==== | ||
Revision as of 00:01, 14 February 2013
< 2013 February 12 Deletion review archives: 2013 February 2013 February 14 >13 February 2013
Heterophobia
This page faced persecution of multiple types. First all the references were removed, then people complained that there were no references then it was deleted. Also, the deletion of this page shows the extreme bias on wikipedia and the fact that both sides of the coin isn't shown. 3abos (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- As closer Happy to have this reviewed. Please note that the nominator has not attempted to discuss the matter with me prior to listing (step 1), but did notify me of the DRV. It's my view that this was a completely transparent case of SNOW. --j⚛e decker 23:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Endorse - Please let's not waste time at DRV reviewing the homophobic antics of a disruptive user. AN encyclopedia is not a platform to promote one's fringe, anti-gay points of view; we all know that, that's why this trashy article was swiftly deleted. Tarc (talk) 00:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Alan O'Connor (closed)
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
I'm curious if this is about the Cork Gaelic footballer who is the only red link on this team list from last year's All-Ireland Championship. It was deleted via PROD because "Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league", which does not apply to Gaelic footballers who cannot play in "a fully pro league". If it is this person he would certainly pass WP:NGAELIC. And here are some sources in case they are needed if it does prove to be this person. RTE Independent Examiner Perhaps someone could check or confirm this? 86.40.111.10 (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC) |
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |