| Revision as of 16:23, 21 February 2013 editHumanpublic (talk | contribs)343 edits →Jesus DRN: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:30, 21 February 2013 edit undoNE Ent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors20,717 edits →Jesus DRN: rNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| Do you know what happened to it? It just disappared. ] (]) 16:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC) | Do you know what happened to it? It just disappared. ] (]) 16:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Was archived by a bot. I've restored it. <small>]</small> 16:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:30, 21 February 2013
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: If you leave a comment for me here, I will respond to it on this same page as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, I'll look for a response there. But you're welcome to follow any style you prefer. Thank you!
| Archives | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Paul Harvey
Yes, I should have cited The Rest of the Story -- that would have been a better link. (Certainly no disrespect to Paul Harvey was intended. I enjoyed his radio commentary for years and years.) But Xerographica has a tendency to leave out portions of pertinent information and add other stuff that is off-topic. (But that is an ANI issue.) The connection with Spinelli is that Xerographica added a remark to Spinelli's talk page User_talk:Hugo_Spinelli#Tearing_down_vs_building_up that seemed calculated to poison the well. Regardless, I engaged with Spinelli -- regarding an AfD and the Haran article -- in a most polite manner. He rebuffed me with comments that echoed X's tone. His tagging my talk page with the edit war message got under my skin. But like the healthy reptile that I am, the old skin is now shedded and I said SORRY on my talk page. If Spinelli reads it, then fine. Perhaps we can, as I had suggested to him earlier, bury the hatchet. – S. Rich (talk) 17:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC) PS: Also, I was not using Paul Harvey to justify my comment to Spinelli. TROTS was WRT X's posting of my comment on the ANI. I hope this clarifies my intent about Harvey. – S. Rich (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Hah! I had to LOL when I saw you post WP:Miscellany_for_deletion#Portolanero.27s_subpages. I had a similar, unproductive, discussion with Spinelli at User_talk:Hugo_Spinelli#User_subpage_advice. I was waiting for a response when I got sidetracked with the Brady Haran CRYSTAL issue. And then this ANI came up. I'm hoping to reconcile so that I could point to Portolano as being a similar problem. In any event, if Portolano's subpages get deleted, it might persuade Spinelli to template his subpages. (But I doubt that I shall have any direct engagement with Spinelli.) – S. Rich (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Jesus DRN
Do you know what happened to it? It just disappared. Humanpublic (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Was archived by a bot. I've restored it. NE Ent 16:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)