| Revision as of 22:13, 29 March 2013 editNE Ent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors20,717 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:22, 30 March 2013 edit undoNE Ent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors20,717 edits →Question: very difficultNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| ::Courcelles also told me he thought an arbitration case should cover all of the recent issues there have been in the race and intelligence topic area. So if there is a request, it should cover all of that as well as FPAS. I know he's not the only person whose conduct related to this area has been a problem. I'd like Arbcom to deal with the other problem editors as well, preferably all in the same case. ] (]) 20:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | ::Courcelles also told me he thought an arbitration case should cover all of the recent issues there have been in the race and intelligence topic area. So if there is a request, it should cover all of that as well as FPAS. I know he's not the only person whose conduct related to this area has been a problem. I'd like Arbcom to deal with the other problem editors as well, preferably all in the same case. ] (]) 20:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::To be successful, a dispute resolution request should be framed in terms of how the encyclopedia as a whole would benefit from the action. Since KoH removed the hard block the particular issue was resolved. Race and Intelligence is just a toxic, intractable political mess and taking any positive action with respect to the situation is going to be extremely difficult. We don't do justice here (see ]</small> 11:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:22, 30 March 2013
I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore
— Howard Beale (Network)
It's time for me to go real life for awhile. The hours of sunlight in my North American locale are increasing rapidly, which brings on more tasks, and a recent employment change have reduced the time I have for my wiki-hobby.
This is not in response to the actions of any individual or group on Misplaced Pages.
"Don't you cry,
I'll be back again some day."
Thumpetty thump thump,
Thumpety thump thump,
Look at NE go.
References
- or rejoice, as applicable
| Archives | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Question
Hello NE Ent. I'm the person who contacted you here, but I finally have an account now.
There is an issue I explained here that I think should be in arbitration. Courcelles told me if I want Arbcom to take a new look at it, I should make a case request. I never have tried to do that before, and I wonder if arbitrators won't take it seriously because I registered so recently, even though before registering I edited for a long time as an IP. But I don't think it should be delayed until after I make more edits from my account, because then arbitrators will think it happened so long ago it no longer matters. You seem familiar with the history of this situation, so can you give any help? Akuri (talk) 10:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- What specific goal do you wish to accomplish? NE Ent 17:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- I think the arbitrators should prohibit Future Perfect at Sunrise from making any more admin actions related to the race and intelligence topic, and maybe also take away his admin powers. In this part of his request a few months ago, Cla68 showed that FPAS already lost his admin powers once before, in the Macedonia 2 case.
- Courcelles also told me he thought an arbitration case should cover all of the recent issues there have been in the race and intelligence topic area. So if there is a request, it should cover all of that as well as FPAS. I know he's not the only person whose conduct related to this area has been a problem. I'd like Arbcom to deal with the other problem editors as well, preferably all in the same case. Akuri (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- To be successful, a dispute resolution request should be framed in terms of how the encyclopedia as a whole would benefit from the action. Since KoH removed the hard block the particular issue was resolved. Race and Intelligence is just a toxic, intractable political mess and taking any positive action with respect to the situation is going to be extremely difficult. We don't do justice here (see
- Courcelles also told me he thought an arbitration case should cover all of the recent issues there have been in the race and intelligence topic area. So if there is a request, it should cover all of that as well as FPAS. I know he's not the only person whose conduct related to this area has been a problem. I'd like Arbcom to deal with the other problem editors as well, preferably all in the same case. Akuri (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC)