| Revision as of 00:13, 1 January 2003 editTakuyaMurata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers89,986 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:39, 1 January 2003 edit undoMrwojo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,712 edits New articles should at least have a definitionNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| So what should we put? At least ISBN code and the name of the publisher is imporant to find the book. --] | So what should we put? At least ISBN code and the name of the publisher is imporant to find the book. --] | ||
| :All articles, even new stubs, should answer basic questions such as "What is it? Why is it important? When did it happen?" in a couple sentences. Articles that lack even a definition look suspicious. --] | |||
Revision as of 00:39, 1 January 2003
Moved the following here: The Wiki Way Quick collaboration on the Web, Addison-Wesley (April, 2001) ISBN: 020171499X by Bo Leuf, Ward Cunningham
See also the homepage of the book.
Misplaced Pages is not a collection of links. -- Zoe
So what should we put? At least ISBN code and the name of the publisher is imporant to find the book. --User:TakuyaMurata
- All articles, even new stubs, should answer basic questions such as "What is it? Why is it important? When did it happen?" in a couple sentences. Articles that lack even a definition look suspicious. --Mrwojo