Revision as of 01:20, 8 April 2013 view sourceCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,417 edits →Gradual Gap Appearance: Removing declined case request <0/7/0/0>← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:41, 10 April 2013 view source Wyattmj (talk | contribs)337 edits →Requests for arbitrationNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | ||
== Copernican_Principle == | |||
'''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 17:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Involved parties === | |||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | |||
*{{userlinks|Wyattmj}}, ''filing party'' | |||
*{{userlinks|username2}} | |||
*{{userlinks|username3}} | |||
*{{userlinks|username4}} | |||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | |||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | |||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> | |||
*Diff. 1 | |||
*Diff. 2 | |||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | |||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | |||
*Link 1 | |||
*Link 2 | |||
=== Statement by {Party 1} === | |||
=== Statement by {Party 2} === | |||
=== Statement by {Party 3} === | |||
=== Clerk notes === | |||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' | |||
=== Copernican_Principle: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0> === | |||
{{anchor|1=Copernican_Principle: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)</small> | |||
* | |||
I am requesting arbitration on this case. On the talk page I have attempted discussion, but gotten very little if any. The jist is the following: | |||
These editors (materialscientist, Drbogdan, and Lithopsian especially) keep reverting my edits; though well thought out and documented. They keep telling me to go to talk, and weeks go by, and no one discusses this. I will take this further. These guys are basically trying to sweep the truth under the rug and use Misplaced Pages to lie to the public. Let them ban me. They are liars at best, and probably much worse, and are making a fool of Misplaced Pages. Every cosmologist knows that what I am saying is true, but the establishment cosmologist who want to protect billions in funding wants to whitewash the truth. Is this what Misplaced Pages is about? Call any cosmologist you know, and ask if the CMB anisotropies and correlation to the ecliptic are an issue for LCDM, big bang, or inflation, and if they have an ounce of integrity they will tell you yes. Read the references I supplied. The truth is breaking out, but apparently not on Misplaced Pages- the last ditch defense for the establishment. ] (]) 17:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:41, 10 April 2013
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Copernican_Principle | 10 April 2013 | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Copernican_Principle
Initiated by Wyattmj (talk) at 17:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Wyattmj (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- username2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- username3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- username4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Diff. 1
- Diff. 2
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Link 1
- Link 2
Statement by {Party 1}
Statement by {Party 2}
Statement by {Party 3}
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Copernican_Principle: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>-Copernican_Principle-2013-04-10T17:41:00.000Z">
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)
I am requesting arbitration on this case. On the talk page I have attempted discussion, but gotten very little if any. The jist is the following:
These editors (materialscientist, Drbogdan, and Lithopsian especially) keep reverting my edits; though well thought out and documented. They keep telling me to go to talk, and weeks go by, and no one discusses this. I will take this further. These guys are basically trying to sweep the truth under the rug and use Misplaced Pages to lie to the public. Let them ban me. They are liars at best, and probably much worse, and are making a fool of Misplaced Pages. Every cosmologist knows that what I am saying is true, but the establishment cosmologist who want to protect billions in funding wants to whitewash the truth. Is this what Misplaced Pages is about? Call any cosmologist you know, and ask if the CMB anisotropies and correlation to the ecliptic are an issue for LCDM, big bang, or inflation, and if they have an ounce of integrity they will tell you yes. Read the references I supplied. The truth is breaking out, but apparently not on Misplaced Pages- the last ditch defense for the establishment. Wyattmj (talk) 17:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)"> ">