Misplaced Pages

User talk:Soham321: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:19, 8 April 2013 editJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,461 edits →Arun Jaitley Issue← Previous edit Revision as of 03:51, 10 April 2013 edit undoSoham321 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,262 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
* Do not add troublesome content to any ], such as: ]ed text, ], ] or ], and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered ]; doing so will result in your account or IP being ]. * Do not add troublesome content to any ], such as: ]ed text, ], ] or ], and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered ]; doing so will result in your account or IP being ].
* Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Misplaced Pages is ]. * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Misplaced Pages is ].

The ] is a good place to start learning about Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions, see the ], add a question to the ] or ask me on ]. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! ] (]) 10:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

== April 2013 ==

] Please do not add or change content, as you did to ], without ] it by citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 -->

::] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 -->

::] This is your '''only warning'''; if you violate Misplaced Pages's ] policy by inserting ] or ] ] content into an article or any other Misplaced Pages page again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-biog4im -->
:::User has again been involved in reverting back the article to the last edits done by him.

Edits done by me have been fully sourced with references. User:MohitSingh and User:Neelkamala are indulging in vandalism.

== Edit warring ==

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr -->

==Your edits on ]==

::] is apparently new to Misplaced Pages as it appears that his only edits are on this page. You have been adding unnecessary details about a particular event or episode. Misplaced Pages is not a space to add all the information related to one person or any particular event/episode. I had added enough content regarding the Arun Jaitely issue but you have been trying to add unnecessary data. I do not need to justify that I am acting in an unbiased manner as I have been in past, praised for removing vandalism from this page which you can verify from ]. You are also requested not to mock other users by using terms such as ''worthy'' etc. I hope he may understand the situation.--] (]) 12:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

===Wiki Links===
] while editing the Arun Jaitley episode has removed the internal links from the terms like ], ], ] etc. He is requested to not to commit such mistakes.--] (]) 12:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

==Arun Jaitley Issue==
A comment has been added about your edits in the concerned section. Please discuss the matter at the talk page before editing the same.--] (]) 12:51, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]&#32;at ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] <sup>(] • ])</sup> 19:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block -->

{{unblock reviewed|reason=User:Neelkamala and User:MohitSingh are using wikipedia to further their own agenda. They are not maintaining a neutral POV while adding their comments on this page and are repeatedly in gross violation of the Misplaced Pages Biography of Living persons guidelines on numerous occasions. I have given specific examples in the talk page of the main article validating my statement. The only reason they are resorting to an edit war is so that the neutral POV i am espousing in this article is replaced by their patently biased and distorted writings. Just because i have not complained about them on their user page does not mean i should be blocked. If you insist on blocking me, you should block them as well. I give below some examples of the repeated violations of Misplaced Pages policy by User:Neelkamala and User:MohitSingh. I post now what i had earlier posted on the talk page of this article: "I am amazed to read MohitSingh's complain about me. It is MohitSingh, and his fellow traveller Neelkamala (the two have been active together and taking the very same position not only on this page but also on the wikipedia pages of Arun Jaitley and also of Digvijay Singh) who are guilty of repeatedly violating Misplaced Pages Biographies of Living persons (WBLP) guidelines. The WBLP guidelines says that one must be very careful to always maintain a neutral POV when writing about a living person. But MohitSingh and Neelkamala have both violated this guideline on several occasions on this page. Here are a few examples: a Times of India article quoted Katju and mentioned that he had made the remark 'in a lighter vein' but Neelkamala twisted the remark and added in his own word 'controversial'. MohitSingh added in the word 'controversial' when referring to Katju's sharing of emails with Pakistani Foreign Secretary Ahmed with the Nation newspaper. There is no controversy because Ahmed says he has forgiven Katju for this. In other words, the matter is closed. MohitSingh is creating a controversy where none exists. MohitSingh and Neelkamala are quick to question anything i write even when i am giving copious references. (It was particularly amusing when they questioned what i had written about Shiva Nath Katju and then subsequently decided not to refer to him again after my long explanation. ) But MohitSingh wrote on this page that Katju had criticized Gular and Javed Akhtar when Katju had done no such thing. It was the reporter who was 'guessing' that Katju was referring to these two poets when he had criticized excessive media attention on two literary figures without taking their name. Another case in point. MohitSingh wrote that Katju's remarks on Pakistan were 'controversial' (a favorite words of MohitSingh and Neelkamala) and were 'criticized' in India and Pakistan. But the fact is that Katju's remarks were welcomed by many people in India and Pakistan, particularly since many people in India and Pakistan share Katju's view. I gave three references in this connection. The leading RSS ideologue P.Parameswaran who welcomed Katju's statement on the eventual reunification of India and Pakistan and whose views were widely reported in mainstream media unlike what MohitSingh is now claiming. Also BJP leader LK Advani made a statement (after Katju had expressed his view on Pakistan) that reunification of India and Pakistan is a part of the ideology of the party he represents. Earlier RJD leader Lalu Yadav had also said exactly the same thing as Katju. Regarding whether Katju's views on Pakistan were welcomed in Pakistan i will point out firstly that the readers's comments section in Katju's article ('The truth about Pakistan') published in a Pakistani newspaper (The Nation) contained many statements by posters who were agreeing with Katju and who were identifying themselves as Pakistanis. Notice the sentence "Katju's views on Pakistan have come in for both criticism and praise in India and Pakistan". I am not denying that his view on Pakistan havs been criticized by many Indians and Pakistanis. At the same time i am stating that his view on Pakistan has also been welcomed by many people in India and Pakistan and many Indians and Pakistanis share his views on Pakistan. Mistakes made by newbies to wikipedia like me can be excused. It is more difficult to excuse blatant violations of Misplaced Pages policy by experienced Misplaced Pages posters like MohitSingh and Neelkamala." User:MohitSingh and User:Neelkamala seem to be working in tandem. They have the same position not only on this page but also on the wikipedia page of Congress leader Digvijay Singh who they harshly criticize on frivolous grounds while violating the Misplaced Pages Biography of Living Persons guideline about maintaining a neutral POV, and of BJP leader Arun Jaitley for whom they offer no criticism. I have no problem if these people are BJP sympathizers or BJP activists but i insist that they not forsake the wikipedia rule about maintaining a neutral POV when writing about living persons.|decline=You are blocked for violating the ]. None of the rest of this is even vaguely relevant, but I do want to point you to ]. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC) }}

Revision as of 03:51, 10 April 2013

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Misplaced Pages:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Misplaced Pages