Misplaced Pages

Talk:Feminism/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Feminism Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:11, 21 April 2013 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits -1 and reorder further← Previous edit Revision as of 05:48, 11 May 2013 edit undoCzar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,623 edits feminismsNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
#Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism. #Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
#The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too fact-based. #The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too fact-based.
#Explanation of "feminisms", as in "multiple feminisms" in the Movements section

Revision as of 05:48, 11 May 2013

  1. Improve article to featured standards
  2. The articles citations need attention. All references need to use the {{cite}} template. And 33 citations needs page numbers.
  3. Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
  4. The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too fact-based.
  5. Explanation of "feminisms", as in "multiple feminisms" in the Movements section