Misplaced Pages

User talk:One Night In Hackney: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:00, 8 May 2013 editGapsamir (talk | contribs)11 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:08, 27 October 2014 edit undoSphilbrick (talk | contribs)Administrators178,717 edits Clarification motion: new sectionNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
I noticed you contributed to ] entry on Misplaced Pages. If you studied at that University, please consider including ] on your userpage. Simply paste <nowiki>{{Template:User Middlesex}}</nowiki> to your userpage. You will be added into Thank you. I noticed you contributed to ] entry on Misplaced Pages. If you studied at that University, please consider including ] on your userpage. Simply paste <nowiki>{{Template:User Middlesex}}</nowiki> to your userpage. You will be added into Thank you.
] (]) 12:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC) ] (]) 12:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

== Clarification motion ==

A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 21:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:08, 27 October 2014

Apparently racist abuse isn't grounds for blocking any more.... 2 lines of K303 19:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC)


Suggestion

Hello! I noticed you contributed to Middlesex University entry on Misplaced Pages. If you studied at that University, please consider including this userbox on your userpage. Simply paste {{Template:User Middlesex}} to your userpage. You will be added into this category Thank you. Invest in knowledge (talk) 12:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Clarification motion

A case (The Troubles) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)