User talk:Afg96: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:46, 27 May 2013 editClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,378,845 editsm Fixing links to archived content. (BOT)← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:11, 27 April 2019 edit undoSerial Number 54129 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,462 edits Warning: Edit warring on University of Bologna‎. (TW)Next edit →
Line 60:		Line 60:

	: Here is an update. In ], ] asked for further talk page discussion of Oz's religion, so I have created ] for that purpose. If you wish to have Oz's religion mentioned in the article, you must participate in the talk page discussions and achieve ]. -- ] (]) 05:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)		: Here is an update. In ], ] asked for further talk page discussion of Oz's religion, so I have created ] for that purpose. If you wish to have Oz's religion mentioned in the article, you must participate in the talk page discussions and achieve ]. -- ] (]) 05:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

			== April 2019 ==
			] Hello, and ]. You appear to be repeatedly ] other editors' contributions at ]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "]" and is usually seen as obstructing the ], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ].

			If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ]]] 16:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:11, 27 April 2019

Welcome!

Hello, Afg96, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! andy 12:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Kennedy Collegiate Institute has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Excirial 21:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Kennedy Collegiate Institute constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Excirial 21:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Afghani mountain

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Afghani mountain, to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Raziman T V (talk) 06:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pakis suck

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Misplaced Pages has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Misplaced Pages and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Thank you.

Mehmet Oz article

The issue of whether Mehmet Oz's article should call him a muslim has already been discussed on the article's talk page. The current decision on the talk page is that the article should not call him a muslim. Please keep in mind that Misplaced Pages's policy on consensus says that "editors who ignore talk page discussions yet continue to edit in or revert disputed material may be guilty of disruptive editing and incur sanctions." -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Mehmet Oz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:39, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Mehmet Oz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

John Stossel

Hi. You removed content from Misplaced Pages with this edit of yours to John Stossel, but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 17:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

April 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Mehmet Oz. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

You've been mentioned in a WP:AN/I discussion regarding the Mehmet Oz page

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruption by user:Afg96. Thank you. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Here is an update. In this follow-up section, User:NE Ent asked for further talk page discussion of Oz's religion, so I have created a new section for that purpose. If you wish to have Oz's religion mentioned in the article, you must participate in the talk page discussions and achieve consensus. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at University of Bologna‎. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ——SerialNumber54129 16:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)