Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
]? If he had kept the U and dropped the l we might have the award winner for 2013. Though ] would have provided stern competition.] 18:30, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
:Well, you know how those pibs are! - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 01:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
== RE: Emptying categories ==
== RE: Emptying categories ==
Revision as of 01:19, 9 June 2013
If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I'll probably add it to my watchlist, but if I miss something, feel free to leave a talkback.
If you leave a message for me: I will most likely respond here. Either add this page to your watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page.
Note: I reserve the right to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to take further action through permissable means. (See this policy.)
If I mistakenly called your edits as vandalism when I reverted them, it was probably because you did not leave an edit summary. Please realize that, in many cases, unexplained edits are indistinguishable from vandalism! This also applies to Rollbacks.
If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you will be reverted...and beware the giant dice.
This editor is an Illustrious Looshpah and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge.
This page has archives. Sections older than 24 hours may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present.
RE: Emptying categories
Hi,
I understand why you reverted my edits, and I respect your decision. The goal was to actually bring a full category with no subcategories, but I guess it's better like it was before my edits. I still might add a direct link to the List of novels based on video games in each subcategory.
See you next time!
--Golden Specter (talk) 09:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
See User talk:Geeciii, refuses to acknowledge his own problem(s) and still carries on with the non-consensus approved changing of content (contravening WP:MOS) on Philippine Army. Also, he has deliberately ignored our advices/warnings to him on more than 1 occasions. Time for a short block to bring our points across? --Dave07:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
TBH, I've had it with that jerk, he's been ignoring us since day 1 of his editing. And he's not helping us having confidence in him by going on with his multiple violations of WP:MOS in them article pages. Sheeesh! --Dave10:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
I was looking through your "No Spin Zone" Userboxes, and I found I agree with about 3/4ths of them, and the other 1/4th are completely opposite to my views. I was sitting there going "yep, yeah, yep... Wait, what??Howicus (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)