Revision as of 16:24, 1 June 2006 view sourceThe Gerg (talk | contribs)1,973 edits →[]: fix tally← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:26, 1 June 2006 view source Aaron Schulz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,051 editsm ()Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
''' ''' | ''' ''' | ||
'''( |
'''(7/1/1) ending <nowiki>10:16</nowiki>, 8 June 2006 (UTC)''' | ||
{{User|Siva1979}} – An excellent contributor who has now been here for the majic six months that many people require, with approaching 10 000 edits. Siva is tenacious and has casued an explosion in the number of articles on ] clubs; Siva has also developed the ] with impressive depth and dedication. I think this editor would make a great admin; the many barnstars on Siva's user page help show this more than anything else! As an English football fan I thought I'd step in front of the others who wanted to nomiante and get in there first! | {{User|Siva1979}} – An excellent contributor who has now been here for the majic six months that many people require, with approaching 10 000 edits. Siva is tenacious and has casued an explosion in the number of articles on ] clubs; Siva has also developed the ] with impressive depth and dedication. I think this editor would make a great admin; the many barnstars on Siva's user page help show this more than anything else! As an English football fan I thought I'd step in front of the others who wanted to nomiante and get in there first! | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#'''Support'''. I have seen Siva do a lot of good work of football-related topics, I have absolutely no reason to believe the tools will be misused. ] 15:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | #'''Support'''. I have seen Siva do a lot of good work of football-related topics, I have absolutely no reason to believe the tools will be misused. ] 15:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Support''' Looks like a great and constructive editor. --<strong>]]<sup>(]/])</sup></strong> 15:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | #'''Support''' Looks like a great and constructive editor. --<strong>]]<sup>(]/])</sup></strong> 15:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Strong Support''' Amazing editor & great guy. --<b>]<font color="green">]</font>]</b><sup>'''<span style="color:#800080">(</span>'''] ¦ ]'''<span style="color:#800080">)</span>'''</sup>'' 15:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Support''' - wonderful editor. Timing's a bit of a non-issue for me: she's (in my opinion) certainly worthy of the mop. --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 16:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
#I voted '''support''' last time, so I'll vote '''support''' this time too. Also, has plenty of portal talk edits. {{userlinks|Elkman}} 16:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Support'''. --]<sup>]</sup> 16:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Support''' good editor, will not abuse his power, and a kind person. '''<font color="DarkRed">]</font><font color="Green">]</font> <font color="DarkRed">]</font>''' 16:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
#'''Weak oppose''' - Too soon since last RFA. Otherwise, should be okay, and would support a future, well-timed RFA. ]]</font> <sub>(]+])</sub> at 15:17 ] <small>(])</small> | #'''Weak oppose''' - Too soon since last RFA. Otherwise, should be okay, and would support a future, well-timed RFA. ]]</font> <sub>(]+])</sub> at 15:17 ] <small>(])</small> | ||
#'''Weak oppose''', I am also a bit turned off by completely useless edits such as . ] ] 15:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' |
Revision as of 16:26, 1 June 2006
Siva1979
Discuss here (7/1/1) ending 10:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Siva1979 (talk · contribs) – An excellent contributor who has now been here for the majic six months that many people require, with approaching 10 000 edits. Siva is tenacious and has casued an explosion in the number of articles on soccer clubs; Siva has also developed the English football league system with impressive depth and dedication. I think this editor would make a great admin; the many barnstars on Siva's user page help show this more than anything else! As an English football fan I thought I'd step in front of the others who wanted to nomiante and get in there first!
Siva has one previous RfA, from April 2006. This was nomianted by User:Tdxiang largely thanks to Siva's work on the SGpedian's noticed board. The nomination failed mainly due to Siva's inexperience. Robdurbar 10:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I accept this nomination. --Siva1979 13:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Support
- Support Hand the mop over already I supported first --Mahogany 15:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support He's gained much experience since the last RfA. I think he can be more than trusted with the buttons -- Samir धर्म 14:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support - a lot more experience and could use the tools (having just come from a 150 page CSD backlog... we need people ... badly...) -- Tawker 14:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- support looks like a comptetent and trustworthy editor - will be the same as an admin. --Bachrach44 15:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support ForestH2
- Support. I have seen Siva do a lot of good work of football-related topics, I have absolutely no reason to believe the tools will be misused. Rje 15:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support Looks like a great and constructive editor. --digital_me 15:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose
- Weak oppose - Too soon since last RFA. Otherwise, should be okay, and would support a future, well-timed RFA. NSLE (T+C) at 15:17 UTC (2006-06-01)
Neutral
- Neutral, pending answer to question below. Dragons flight 15:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- See Siva1979's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.
- User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js:
Username Siva1979 Total edits 7944 Distinct pages edited 5808 Average edits/page 1.368 First edit 23:14, January 6, 2006 (main) 2767 Talk 382 User 211 User talk 2323 Image 59 Image talk 22 MediaWiki talk 22 Template 56 Template talk 25 Help 22 Help talk 23 Category 19 Category talk 13 Misplaced Pages 1653 Misplaced Pages talk 321 Portal 13 Portal talk 13
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Misplaced Pages backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A: I would like to have the additional tools of an admin to speedy delete test and attack pages. I would also like to increase my involvement in AfD articles to increase the efficiency of keeping or deleting articles that have a common overwelming response or vote. Admin powers would also help me to delete redirects with history that block a move, or to merge histories of pages moved by cut and paste. These powers would also help me to fight vandalism with a server-based rollbock, blocking persistent vandals and protecting pages that have undergone frequent vandalism.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A: I am pleased to be able to remove all the red-links of English soccer clubs in the National League System from step 1 to 6. I have also created links for all the English soccer leagues from step 1 to 7. Although most of the articles I have created are just stubs, I have recently began to add images to these articles. I have also incresed the content for some of these articles. I also wish to give credit to other users who were able to expand some of these articles into having a more encyclopedic content. I also welcome new IP addresses and users and added signatures for comments that lack proper signatures.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: There have not been any major conflicts. However, in the first few weeks of editing, I experienced some oppostition in the manner in which I contributed to the 1911 Britannica topics. I learned and acknowledged my mistakes and improved my contributions in this are of Misplaced Pages. In the beginning, I felt a bit of stress because I thought that I was not doing a good job and I was only trying to help out. But I used the feedback to improve on my edits. In the future, if I receive any negative feedback, I would use this opportunity to move my edits to a higher level. In this way, I would become a more solid contributor to Misplaced Pages.
- 4. (from Dragons flight) Since you've joined Misplaced Pages, you have voted in at least dozens and quite possibly hundreds of RFAs. Based on your voting record you would seem to have an extremely low standard for adminship. In going over your contributions to Misplaced Pages space, I noticed only 3 RFAs that you opposed and all of which had the distinction of not having a single support vote. By contrast, there are examples where yours is one of only a handful of support votes on RFAs that are overwhelmingly opposed. Please explain your rationale for deciding how to vote in RFAs with specific attention to what would make a candidate unqualified for adminship in your opinion.