Talk:Central Terminal (LRT): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:44, 5 September 2013 editNa Na Utlog (talk \| contribs)167 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:39, 5 September 2013 edit undoJeromesandilanico (talk \| contribs)3,634 editsm →Name Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::The later explanation is right and uncontested, then if you need sourcing better remove the entire or majority of the articles as this are all lacking references. I know this for a fact that I had worked for LRTA back then and the name is derived from being such and even a no-brainer would get why it was named as such. Therefore, removal/reverting of this edit will merit you a suspension. ] <small> (]) </small> 01:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)		::The later explanation is right and uncontested, then if you need sourcing better remove the entire or majority of the articles as this are all lacking references. I know this for a fact that I had worked for LRTA back then and the name is derived from being such and even a no-brainer would get why it was named as such. Therefore, removal/reverting of this edit will merit you a suspension. ] <small> (]) </small> 01:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
	:::Your explanation JSD, the later one, does not correspond to the one which has been in the article for years. In that way, the reason this LRT station got it's name, is a subject of doubt, is contested. The reasons you're giving you know this for a fact are, what Misplaced Pages uses to call ''Original Research''. What's more, you were born during Ramos' administration, which even disqualifies you, as you were not even born when the station was named. A source on the naming is needed. - ] (]) 13:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)		:::Your explanation JSD, the later one, does not correspond to the one which has been in the article for years. In that way, the reason this LRT station got it's name, is a subject of doubt, is contested. The reasons you're giving you know this for a fact are, what Misplaced Pages uses to call ''Original Research''. What's more, you were born during Ramos' administration, which even disqualifies you, as you were not even born when the station was named. A source on the naming is needed. - ] (]) 13:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
			::::::Clearly you are out of your mind, first is that this is a unquestionable no-brainer fact and a person who has a very low comprehension skill would be the only one not to be able to decipher even without resource backing why the station is named as such. To make it simple there are only three terminals in the original or main line of the LRT Line 1 namely the North end or '''Monumento Terminal''' Station, South end or the '''Baclaran Terminal''' Station and the only terminal between these two terminals of which the name was derived and thus called '''Central Terminal''' Station. Age is not the issue here as i had my On-the-Job training in the line just this 2011 and part of our task is to get to know the history of the line which included history on why Central Terminal is called as such and not Arrocceros which by the way is more unreferenced and puts your argument on bad grounds. In the mean time if you really want to contest the fact, dont revert the edits I made just yet, but wait and let the other wikipedians decide on the matter especially those like me who have been doing this for a long time and leave my edit until a consensus is made.] <small> (]) </small> 16:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:39, 5 September 2013

Tambayan Philippines Start‑class Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Stub‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

This article lacks references.

Name

Later explanation: The station is called Central Terminal as the station is originally the only terminal station in between the line.
Earlier explanation: The station is so-called because it lies at the center of the line.

Which one is right, a source should help us out according to policy (All material in Misplaced Pages articles must be attributable to a reliable published source, per "WP:SOURCE"). In the mean time, the specific line should better be left out, imho. - Na Na Utlog (talk) 15:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

The later explanation is right and uncontested, then if you need sourcing better remove the entire or majority of the articles as this are all lacking references. I know this for a fact that I had worked for LRTA back then and the name is derived from being such and even a no-brainer would get why it was named as such. Therefore, removal/reverting of this edit will merit you a suspension. JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 01:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your explanation JSD, the later one, does not correspond to the one which has been in the article for years. In that way, the reason this LRT station got it's name, is a subject of doubt, is contested. The reasons you're giving you know this for a fact are, what Misplaced Pages uses to call Original Research. What's more, you were born during Ramos' administration, which even disqualifies you, as you were not even born when the station was named. A source on the naming is needed. - Na Na Utlog (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Clearly you are out of your mind, first is that this is a unquestionable no-brainer fact and a person who has a very low comprehension skill would be the only one not to be able to decipher even without resource backing why the station is named as such. To make it simple there are only three terminals in the original or main line of the LRT Line 1 namely the North end or Monumento Terminal Station, South end or the Baclaran Terminal Station and the only terminal between these two terminals of which the name was derived and thus called Central Terminal Station. Age is not the issue here as i had my On-the-Job training in the line just this 2011 and part of our task is to get to know the history of the line which included history on why Central Terminal is called as such and not Arrocceros which by the way is more unreferenced and puts your argument on bad grounds. In the mean time if you really want to contest the fact, dont revert the edits I made just yet, but wait and let the other wikipedians decide on the matter especially those like me who have been doing this for a long time and leave my edit until a consensus is made.JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Categories: