Misplaced Pages

Talk:Stallion: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:03, 23 September 2013 editMontanabw (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers105,492 edits →Hopefully moving on - to a more objective and correct (true) article...: Nope.← Previous edit Revision as of 13:17, 23 September 2013 edit undoLittleolive oil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,081 edits →Hopefully moving on - to a more objective and correct (true) article...: edits not editorsNext edit →
Line 47: Line 47:


:Well, you look like our old friend User IP 83.78.114.68, with a new IP. You were ] then and you are still ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC) :Well, you look like our old friend User IP 83.78.114.68, with a new IP. You were ] then and you are still ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

::To the IP above: Your best bet is to deal with specifics in the article and to deal with the edits, and actual content and its weight per mainstream sources rather than assume motive on the part of the editors. (] (]) 13:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC))

Revision as of 13:17, 23 September 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stallion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
WikiProject iconEquine B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHorse racing B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAgriculture B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Archiving icon
Archives

1


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Dispute resolution locations

At:

Pesky (talk …stalk!) 17:48, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Hopefully moving on ...

IP's DRN request has been "closed as unproductive". Final tirade accuses me of trying to "out" the IP, who seems to misunderstand a heads-up conflict of interest note (not placed by me in any event) as "outing" or "attempted outing". I think (sadly) that the extent of denial in this case is something that no amount of words or reason/ing can change. It's "beyond reason" in the truest sense of the phrase. Just a case now of keeping eyes open, and getting on with building an encyclopaedia! There's an outside chance that I may be able to get some footage of our naturally-managed stallions in this area to upload to Commons, which would be a better long-term move in case the video footage and pictures of naturally-managed stallions disappear from the other site at any point. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 19:48, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

A thought has just occurred to me: it seems more than likely that the IP didn't realise that New Forest refers to a breed of pony, and not just to the geographical area of the same name. To the best of my knowledge, the site the IP was objecting to is managed by a breed-society member who doesn't actually live in the geographical area of the New Forest. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 14:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Archiving

Probably time to set up an auto-archive box on this article. Montanabw 00:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Done! Dreadstar ☥ 00:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Bachelor herd research

this is interesting, parking for future integration into the article: Montanabw 16:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)


Hopefully moving on - to a more objective and correct (true) article...

This article is (in part very heavily) biased and non-neutral in favor of medically needless castration of male horses. It is biased because the majority of female Misplaced Pages-editors here, who dominate the discussion what goes into this article and what not, are castrato-users, (ab)use male horses as castratos, with a heavy personal interest and involvement in needless castration (= severe sexual mutilation) of male horses for riding and other human pleasures. There are many false references about how castrating would supposedly be good, where it's not, where it would make male animals "happier", etc. and that natural keeping of intact male horse were difficult, unnatural or otherwise not practical or good for all male horses. My points I made about this article all along (2 years ago). My points were all proven by the article of the Swiss National Stud featured on www.plosone.org). - Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.62.245.182 (talk) 05:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Well, you look like our old friend User IP 83.78.114.68, with a new IP. You were WP:FRINGE then and you are still WP:FRINGE. Montanabw 06:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
To the IP above: Your best bet is to deal with specifics in the article and to deal with the edits, and actual content and its weight per mainstream sources rather than assume motive on the part of the editors. (olive (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC))
Categories: