| Revision as of 21:35, 29 September 2013 editAstrocog (talk | contribs)4,727 edits edit warring warning - please engage in a discussion← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:36, 29 September 2013 edit undoAstrocog (talk | contribs)4,727 editsm →Deaths sections on the Blue Line (Minnesota) article: sigNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | ||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}You have reverted the same edit on this article 3 times, and each time you have been asked either on your talk page or in the edit summaries to engage in a discussion. You have not done so. Please provide a rationale for your reverts.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}You have reverted the same edit on this article 3 times, and each time you have been asked either on your talk page or in the edit summaries to engage in a discussion. You have not done so. Please provide a rationale for your reverts.] (]) 21:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | ||
Revision as of 21:36, 29 September 2013
September 2013
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Blue Line (Minnesota), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The section you have repeatedly added has been discussed in talk. Please provide your rationale in talk before adding again. AstroCog (talk) 16:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Blue Line (Minnesota). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please provide a rationale for why you persist in adding material to this article that has already been discussed in talk. AstroCog (talk) 00:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Deaths sections on the Blue Line (Minnesota) article
Greetings - can you please provide some insight into why you have added back material twice that was removed due to a discussion on the article's talk page? There may be a way to re-incorporate some of this material into the article, but please engage other editors in a discussion before reverting edits made because of a talk page consensus. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 00:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Blue Line (Minnesota) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You have reverted the same edit on this article 3 times, and each time you have been asked either on your talk page or in the edit summaries to engage in a discussion. You have not done so. Please provide a rationale for your reverts.AstroCog (talk) 21:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)