Revision as of 21:45, 29 September 2013 editUseddenim (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors37,050 editsm →Template:Metro Line: typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:06, 30 September 2013 edit undo117Avenue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,480 edits →Template:Metro Line: replyNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::Did you just leave another conversation without garnering consensus for the changes you want to make? ] (]) 02:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | ::Did you just leave another conversation without garnering consensus for the changes you want to make? ] (]) 02:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::Why the sudden concern? You don't seem bothered that you apparently ] ] off Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 21:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | :::Why the sudden concern? You don't seem bothered that you apparently ] ] off Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 21:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::Again you are avoiding the issues. I don't want to bully you, but the only way to get you to talk is to revert you. ] (]) 00:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:06, 30 September 2013
Trains Template‑class | |||||||||
|
Canada: Alberta Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 10 September 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Template:Metro Line
Please revert your changes to Template:Metro Line. Your additions are unreferenced, and no one has stated they want proposed stations and lines in the route diagrams. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 03:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Firstly, I do not appreciate being referred to as a “no one”. Just be honest and admit that you don’t want proposed stations and lines in the route diagrams. Secondly, you are the source of the St. Albert stations—specifically this edit from 10 September.
Your edit summaries indicate that you don’t understand the function of a route diagram, and you didn’t seem to think that Template:Valley Line (ETS) was of any use until the links to neighbourhoods were added, so stop being such a hypocrite. Useddenim (talk) 01:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)- Where or when have you stated you want proposed stations in Edmonton route diagrams? There is a consensus here and here to not include this information in the diagrams or images. In that edit I added the identified locations, the table does not say that it is the stations' names. I am removing your references because they do no support your added content. My edit summaries are to encourage discussion (WP:BRD), something you need to greatly improve upon when you make edits you know are controversial, or appear to be redundant. I don't think I am a hypocrite, I have always wanted a consistent list and navboxes, and to not mislead readers. Is this diagram supposed to be a list of stations? I assume it is, since MacEwan links to MacEwan Station, not the university. It is misleading to make Griesbach linkable also, but have it lead to an article unrelated to public transit. 117Avenue (talk) 03:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Did you just leave another conversation without garnering consensus for the changes you want to make? 117Avenue (talk) 02:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Why the sudden concern? You don't seem bothered that you apparently bullied Gingeroscar off Misplaced Pages. Useddenim (talk) 21:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Again you are avoiding the issues. I don't want to bully you, but the only way to get you to talk is to revert you. 117Avenue (talk) 00:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Why the sudden concern? You don't seem bothered that you apparently bullied Gingeroscar off Misplaced Pages. Useddenim (talk) 21:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)