Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:::Why the sudden concern? You don't seem bothered that you apparently ] ] off Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 21:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
:::Why the sudden concern? You don't seem bothered that you apparently ] ] off Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 21:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
::::Again you are avoiding the issues. I don't want to bully you, but the only way to get you to talk is to revert you. ] (]) 00:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
::::Again you are avoiding the issues. I don't want to bully you, but the only way to get you to talk is to revert you. ] (]) 00:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
== Nice Work ==
Nice work on the template as I had a month ago had asked for.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Firstly, I do not appreciate being referred to as a “no one”. Just be honest and admit that you don’t want proposed stations and lines in the route diagrams. Secondly, you are the source of the St. Albert stations—specifically this edit from 10 September. Your edit summaries indicate that you don’t understand the function of a route diagram, and you didn’t seem to think that Template:Valley Line (ETS) was of any use until the links to neighbourhoods were added, so stop being such a hypocrite. Useddenim (talk) 01:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Where or when have you stated you want proposed stations in Edmonton route diagrams? There is a consensus here and here to not include this information in the diagrams or images. In that edit I added the identified locations, the table does not say that it is the stations' names. I am removing your references because they do no support your added content. My edit summaries are to encourage discussion (WP:BRD), something you need to greatly improve upon when you make edits you know are controversial, or appear to be redundant. I don't think I am a hypocrite, I have always wanted a consistent list and navboxes, and to not mislead readers. Is this diagram supposed to be a list of stations? I assume it is, since MacEwan links to MacEwan Station, not the university. It is misleading to make Griesbach linkable also, but have it lead to an article unrelated to public transit. 117Avenue (talk) 03:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
