| Revision as of 11:43, 11 October 2013 editMusarabbyahmad (talk | contribs)86 edits →Why did you revert the Moscow weatherbox?: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:54, 11 October 2013 edit undoMarek69 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers195,899 edits →Why did you revert the Moscow weatherbox?: reply to user: MusarabbyahmadNext edit → | ||
| Line 482: | Line 482: | ||
| Why did you reverted my changing in Moscow weatherbox? I was fixing the mistakes in the weatherbox. Please don't revert again. Understand. ] (]) 11:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC) | Why did you reverted my changing in Moscow weatherbox? I was fixing the mistakes in the weatherbox. Please don't revert again. Understand. ] (]) 11:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi ], I explained in my edit summary: ''"RV unsourced, unexplained changes to statistical data"'' | |||
| :You seem to be making changes to multiple pages where you alter the climate data without giving any explanation or providing a ] for the changes. | |||
| :You can read more about our policy on sourcing in ]. | |||
| :I notice from your talk page that other editors have already explained this to you. | |||
| :Kind Regards -- ]<small>.]<sup>]</sup></small> 13:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:54, 11 October 2013
Status: Online 
| Please leave a new message. |
| This is Marek69's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
 Archives |
Search archives: |
Question
I have mentioned the following problem before and nothing has changed, so I include an example below which proves my point as it also gives the Audio pronunciation. The problem is the Punctuation signs. In English, a small flat line over the vowel means a Long sound, as A sounding like Ayy, or as in the word ABLE. The same for i,e,o,u. For a different "short" sound, a small cup shaped line is usually used- or nowadays it is just left open.
They get it correct in the literature further in the page, but NEVER in the first dark example of the word.This is contributing to many differing opinions on how a word sounds. The following example the word "mudra" , if you read as it shows would be 'mudrahy'. But it is correctly pronounced 'mudruh'. So, then, either please tell me how to fix this- OR- surely your programmer could just make a command to repair all first word examples?? This may sound petty, but it has caused considerable arguments! Below is the example- cheers
https://en.wikipedia.org/Mudras — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeevenson (talk • contribs) 00:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Previous punctuation marks problem/question.
I forgot to sign previous msg with these Jeevenson (talk) 00:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC) I really would like your response, or an answer would be much appreciated.jeevenson
- Hi Jeevenson, thank you for your message.
- You say "I have mentioned the following problem before and nothing has changed,"
- I have searched my talk page archive, and have found only one previous message from you, which was a question about the Iranian Calendar, on 30 October 2011.
- I replied that it was outside my area of knowledge and I recommended that you ask again at the Misplaced Pages:Reference desk, where someone could most probably help.
- The article you give as an example Mudra; again it is not in my area of expertise. I am very sorry.
- I would direct you again to either the Misplaced Pages Help desk or the Misplaced Pages Teahouse, where you have more chance in finding someone who knows a little about the subject.
- I'm sorry I couldn't help you, but I wish you best of luck in sorting your issue. :-)
- Kind Regards -- Marek.69 12:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2013
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Misplaced Pages articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:54, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revert the Moscow weatherbox?
Why did you reverted my changing in Moscow weatherbox? I was fixing the mistakes in the weatherbox. Please don't revert again. Understand. Musarabbyahmad (talk) 11:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Musarabbyahmad, I explained in my edit summary: "RV unsourced, unexplained changes to statistical data"
- You seem to be making changes to multiple pages where you alter the climate data without giving any explanation or providing a reliable source for the changes.
- You can read more about our policy on sourcing in Misplaced Pages:Verifiability.
- I notice from your talk page that other editors have already explained this to you.
- Kind Regards -- Marek.69 13:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)