Misplaced Pages

Talk:Texas A&M University/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Texas A&M University Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:43, 12 June 2006 editTexink (talk | contribs)1,376 edits updated← Previous edit Revision as of 07:18, 12 June 2006 edit undo66.90.168.198 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
* '''History''' - full article at ]. PD photos would be useful; expansion on period from 1890-1959 and 1970- needed. * '''History''' - full article at ]. PD photos would be useful; expansion on 1900-1959 and 1970- needed.
* '''Academics''' - expand and condense at the same time, eliminate boosterism while expanding to ensure everything is covered * '''Academics''' - expand and condense at the same time, eliminate boosterism while expanding to ensure everything is covered
* '''Athletics''' - full article at ]; expansion on history of specific sports needed. * '''Athletics''' - full article at ]; expansion on history of specific sports needed.

Revision as of 07:18, 12 June 2006

  • History - full article at History of Texas A&M University. PD photos would be useful; expansion on 1900-1959 and 1970- needed.
  • Academics - expand and condense at the same time, eliminate boosterism while expanding to ensure everything is covered
  • Athletics - full article at Texas Aggie Athletics; expansion on history of specific sports needed.
  • Notable Buildings - Possibility for removal. Buildings notable enough to be really encyclopedic get their own article, anything else can be covered by a passing mention somewhere else in the article.
  • Student Life - Expand.
  • Endowment - Requires total rewrite. How else does the University generate income other than the PUF? Perhaps include with research as at University of Michigan.
  • Notes/Sources - Fix format using <ref> and <references/> style.
  • Eliminate boosterism throughout.
  • Ensure conformity with Wiki guidelines/policies, including NPOV, bolding, and pictures
  • Convert lists to prose
  • Rankings - all given as if they were facts when really within the article should be saying "ranked number 1 in petroleum according to source X"